Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Thailand
Thailand: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 61,042 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
61,042 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.6%
World rank
6th
of 76 countries
All-time high
62,565 1000 Int$
in 2020
All-time low
4,794 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Thailand, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Thailand recorded 61,042 1000 Int$ for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and up 5.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Thailand peaked at 62,565 1000 Int$ in 2020 and was at its lowest, 4,794 1000 Int$, in 1961.
Thailand ranks 6th of 76 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Thailand, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 4,794 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 5,230 1000 Int$ | +9.1% |
| 1963 | 5,666 1000 Int$ | +8.3% |
| 1964 | 6,102 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 1965 | 6,538 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1966 | 6,973 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1967 | 7,409 1000 Int$ | +6.3% |
| 1968 | 7,845 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1969 | 8,281 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 1970 | 8,717 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1971 | 9,153 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1972 | 9,588 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1973 | 10,024 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1974 | 10,460 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1975 | 10,896 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1976 | 11,332 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1977 | 11,768 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1978 | 12,204 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1979 | 12,639 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 1980 | 13,265 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1981 | 19,275 1000 Int$ | +45.3% |
| 1982 | 12,122 1000 Int$ | -37.1% |
| 1983 | 11,986 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1984 | 11,768 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1985 | 11,550 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 1986 | 11,332 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 1987 | 11,114 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 1988 | 10,896 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 1989 | 10,896 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 9,296 1000 Int$ | -14.7% |
| 1991 | 11,136 1000 Int$ | +19.8% |
| 1992 | 11,614 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1993 | 11,986 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 1994 | 16,344 1000 Int$ | +36.4% |
| 1995 | 19,831 1000 Int$ | +21.3% |
| 1996 | 23,753 1000 Int$ | +19.8% |
| 1997 | 24,407 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1998 | 23,535 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 1999 | 27,022 1000 Int$ | +14.8% |
| 2000 | 30,716 1000 Int$ | +13.7% |
| 2001 | 32,098 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 2002 | 29,591 1000 Int$ | -7.8% |
| 2003 | 32,153 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 2004 | 41,696 1000 Int$ | +29.7% |
| 2005 | 33,099 1000 Int$ | -20.6% |
| 2006 | 39,994 1000 Int$ | +20.8% |
| 2007 | 47,374 1000 Int$ | +18.5% |
| 2008 | 50,517 1000 Int$ | +6.6% |
| 2009 | 48,366 1000 Int$ | -4.3% |
| 2010 | 49,315 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2011 | 53,608 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 2012 | 54,480 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2013 | 55,352 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2014 | 57,925 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2015 | 60,863 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 2016 | 58,047 1000 Int$ | -4.6% |
| 2017 | 60,955 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 2018 | 59,955 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 2019 | 59,652 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 2020 | 62,565 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 2021 | 60,724 1000 Int$ | -2.9% |
| 2022 | 60,980 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 61,423 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2024 | 61,042 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,538 1000 Int$ | 4,794 1000 Int$ | 8,281 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 10,678 1000 Int$ | 8,717 1000 Int$ | 12,639 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 12,420 1000 Int$ | 10,896 1000 Int$ | 19,275 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 17,892 1000 Int$ | 9,296 1000 Int$ | 27,022 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 38,560 1000 Int$ | 29,591 1000 Int$ | 50,517 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 57,015 1000 Int$ | 49,315 1000 Int$ | 60,955 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 61,347 1000 Int$ | 60,724 1000 Int$ | 62,565 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Thailand
- 3 Indonesia 83,732 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1.08 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Namibia 82,662 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 201,027 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Papua New Guinea 80,554 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Peru 60,238 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Melanesia 81,432 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Mexico 40,089 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 13,686 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 10,828 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Nepal 33,445 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Thailand
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 7.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0875 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 704.7 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.51 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.372 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Thailand?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Thailand was 61,042 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Thailand?
- The highest recorded value was 62,565 1000 Int$ in 2020.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Thailand?
- The lowest recorded value was 4,794 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Thailand rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Thailand ranks 6th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Thailand?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Thailand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.