Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Mexico
Mexico: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 40,089 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
40,089 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 7.5%
World rank
8th
of 76 countries
All-time high
53,766 1000 Int$
in 2016
All-time low
4,830 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Mexico, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Mexico recorded 40,089 1000 Int$ for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in 2024.
That represents a change of down 7.5% on the previous year and down 1.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Mexico peaked at 53,766 1000 Int$ in 2016 and was at its lowest, 4,830 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Mexico 8th out of 76 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Mexico, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 4,830 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 5,922 1000 Int$ | +22.6% |
| 1963 | 7,212 1000 Int$ | +21.8% |
| 1964 | 7,749 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1965 | 7,178 1000 Int$ | -7.4% |
| 1966 | 7,672 1000 Int$ | +6.9% |
| 1967 | 5,900 1000 Int$ | -23.1% |
| 1968 | 6,611 1000 Int$ | +12.1% |
| 1969 | 6,987 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 1970 | 7,712 1000 Int$ | +10.4% |
| 1971 | 8,493 1000 Int$ | +10.1% |
| 1972 | 12,197 1000 Int$ | +43.6% |
| 1973 | 6,762 1000 Int$ | -44.6% |
| 1974 | 8,945 1000 Int$ | +32.3% |
| 1975 | 8,140 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
| 1976 | 7,572 1000 Int$ | -7.0% |
| 1977 | 9,026 1000 Int$ | +19.2% |
| 1978 | 16,108 1000 Int$ | +78.5% |
| 1979 | 12,249 1000 Int$ | -24.0% |
| 1980 | 9,282 1000 Int$ | -24.2% |
| 1981 | 12,317 1000 Int$ | +32.7% |
| 1982 | 12,153 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 1983 | 14,216 1000 Int$ | +17.0% |
| 1984 | 17,516 1000 Int$ | +23.2% |
| 1985 | 11,178 1000 Int$ | -36.2% |
| 1986 | 20,131 1000 Int$ | +80.1% |
| 1987 | 15,089 1000 Int$ | -25.0% |
| 1988 | 15,872 1000 Int$ | +5.2% |
| 1989 | 18,613 1000 Int$ | +17.3% |
| 1990 | 19,119 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1991 | 16,379 1000 Int$ | -14.3% |
| 1992 | 15,972 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 1993 | 18,915 1000 Int$ | +18.4% |
| 1994 | 20,915 1000 Int$ | +10.6% |
| 1995 | 20,825 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 1996 | 21,772 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1997 | 18,888 1000 Int$ | -13.2% |
| 1998 | 23,498 1000 Int$ | +24.4% |
| 1999 | 24,524 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 2000 | 26,513 1000 Int$ | +8.1% |
| 2001 | 26,194 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2002 | 24,559 1000 Int$ | -6.2% |
| 2003 | 36,366 1000 Int$ | +48.1% |
| 2004 | 36,822 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2005 | 40,361 1000 Int$ | +9.6% |
| 2006 | 41,604 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2007 | 33,739 1000 Int$ | -18.9% |
| 2008 | 39,233 1000 Int$ | +16.3% |
| 2009 | 34,384 1000 Int$ | -12.4% |
| 2010 | 40,156 1000 Int$ | +16.8% |
| 2011 | 38,071 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 2012 | 45,804 1000 Int$ | +20.3% |
| 2013 | 39,106 1000 Int$ | -14.6% |
| 2014 | 40,792 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 2015 | 42,103 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 2016 | 53,766 1000 Int$ | +27.7% |
| 2017 | 47,182 1000 Int$ | -12.2% |
| 2018 | 44,789 1000 Int$ | -5.1% |
| 2019 | 48,153 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 2020 | 46,168 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 2021 | 45,342 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 2022 | 41,444 1000 Int$ | -8.6% |
| 2023 | 43,328 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 2024 | 40,089 1000 Int$ | -7.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,673 1000 Int$ | 4,830 1000 Int$ | 7,749 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 9,720 1000 Int$ | 6,762 1000 Int$ | 16,108 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 14,637 1000 Int$ | 9,282 1000 Int$ | 20,131 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 20,081 1000 Int$ | 15,972 1000 Int$ | 24,524 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 33,978 1000 Int$ | 24,559 1000 Int$ | 41,604 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 43,992 1000 Int$ | 38,071 1000 Int$ | 53,766 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 43,274 1000 Int$ | 40,089 1000 Int$ | 46,168 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 201,027 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Papua New Guinea 80,554 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Thailand 61,042 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Peru 60,238 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Melanesia 81,432 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 13,686 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 10,828 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Nepal 33,445 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Colombia 28,140 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Timor-Leste 5,948 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Botswana 23,153 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Micronesia 1,395 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Mexico
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 0.4963 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0388 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 539.47 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5998 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1996 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Mexico?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Mexico was 40,089 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 53,766 1000 Int$ in 2016.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 4,830 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Mexico rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Mexico ranks 8th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.