Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Namibia
Namibia: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 82,662 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
82,662 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.3%
World rank
4th
of 76 countries
All-time high
83,590 1000 Int$
in 2020
All-time low
30,509 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Namibia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Namibia is 82,662 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.3% on the previous year and up 7.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Namibia peaked at 83,590 1000 Int$ in 2020 and was at its lowest, 30,509 1000 Int$, in 1961.
Namibia ranks 4th of 76 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Namibia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 30,509 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 32,688 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1963 | 33,124 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1964 | 34,867 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1965 | 35,303 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1966 | 35,521 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 35,957 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1968 | 35,957 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 36,611 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1970 | 36,828 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1971 | 37,046 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1972 | 37,264 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1973 | 38,136 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1974 | 38,136 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 38,790 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 1976 | 38,790 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 39,226 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1978 | 39,661 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1979 | 40,097 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1980 | 40,097 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 40,969 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1982 | 41,405 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1983 | 42,059 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1984 | 43,148 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1985 | 43,584 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1986 | 44,020 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1987 | 44,891 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1988 | 45,763 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1989 | 45,763 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 46,199 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1991 | 46,853 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1992 | 42,494 1000 Int$ | -9.3% |
| 1993 | 43,584 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 45,763 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1995 | 47,942 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1996 | 50,122 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1997 | 52,301 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1998 | 53,390 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1999 | 54,480 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2000 | 55,570 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2001 | 58,838 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 2002 | 62,107 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 2003 | 64,286 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 2004 | 66,466 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 2005 | 68,645 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 2006 | 69,734 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2007 | 71,914 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2008 | 70,413 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 2009 | 68,645 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 2010 | 71,914 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 2011 | 72,977 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2012 | 73,657 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 2013 | 76,272 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 2014 | 77,122 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2015 | 78,164 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2016 | 79,055 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2017 | 79,934 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 81,059 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2019 | 82,350 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 83,590 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2021 | 82,333 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 2022 | 82,758 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2023 | 82,894 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 82,662 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 34,504 1000 Int$ | 30,509 1000 Int$ | 36,611 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 38,397 1000 Int$ | 36,828 1000 Int$ | 40,097 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 43,170 1000 Int$ | 40,097 1000 Int$ | 45,763 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 48,313 1000 Int$ | 42,494 1000 Int$ | 54,480 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 65,662 1000 Int$ | 55,570 1000 Int$ | 71,914 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 77,250 1000 Int$ | 71,914 1000 Int$ | 82,350 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 82,847 1000 Int$ | 82,333 1000 Int$ | 83,590 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
- 1 Ethiopia PDR 566,591 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Pakistan 140,162 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Indonesia 83,732 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1.08 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 201,027 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Papua New Guinea 80,554 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Thailand 61,042 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Peru 60,238 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Melanesia 81,432 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Namibia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0699 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 340.78 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4913 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 7.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 7.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.5% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Namibia?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Namibia was 82,662 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 83,590 1000 Int$ in 2020.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 30,509 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Namibia rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Namibia ranks 4th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Namibia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.