Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Peru
Peru: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 60,238 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
60,238 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.3%
World rank
7th
of 76 countries
All-time high
61,213 1000 Int$
in 2013
All-time low
22,664 1000 Int$
in 1964
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Peru, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Peru is 60,238 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 0.3% on the previous year and down 1.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Peru peaked at 61,213 1000 Int$ in 2013 and was at its lowest, 22,664 1000 Int$, in 1964.
That places Peru 7th out of 76 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Peru, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 25,540 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 27,773 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 1963 | 25,664 1000 Int$ | -7.6% |
| 1964 | 22,664 1000 Int$ | -11.7% |
| 1965 | 32,285 1000 Int$ | +42.5% |
| 1966 | 28,763 1000 Int$ | -10.9% |
| 1967 | 31,981 1000 Int$ | +11.2% |
| 1968 | 26,734 1000 Int$ | -16.4% |
| 1969 | 33,779 1000 Int$ | +26.4% |
| 1970 | 40,832 1000 Int$ | +20.9% |
| 1971 | 36,151 1000 Int$ | -11.5% |
| 1972 | 33,287 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 1973 | 32,734 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 1974 | 32,647 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 1975 | 31,881 1000 Int$ | -2.3% |
| 1976 | 30,946 1000 Int$ | -2.9% |
| 1977 | 34,505 1000 Int$ | +11.5% |
| 1978 | 33,863 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 1979 | 33,466 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 1980 | 37,669 1000 Int$ | +12.6% |
| 1981 | 44,648 1000 Int$ | +18.5% |
| 1982 | 47,077 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1983 | 44,408 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 1984 | 49,843 1000 Int$ | +12.2% |
| 1985 | 49,795 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1986 | 50,427 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1987 | 50,405 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 1988 | 50,405 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 50,427 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 54,763 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 1991 | 54,179 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1992 | 56,942 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 1993 | 55,349 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 1994 | 58,294 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1995 | 52,423 1000 Int$ | -10.1% |
| 1996 | 43,207 1000 Int$ | -17.6% |
| 1997 | 47,769 1000 Int$ | +10.6% |
| 1998 | 54,060 1000 Int$ | +13.2% |
| 1999 | 51,420 1000 Int$ | -4.9% |
| 2000 | 57,617 1000 Int$ | +12.1% |
| 2001 | 57,424 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2002 | 56,514 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 2003 | 54,909 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 2004 | 49,159 1000 Int$ | -10.5% |
| 2005 | 54,072 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 2006 | 54,028 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2007 | 55,195 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 2008 | 54,567 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 2009 | 57,356 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 2010 | 55,074 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 2011 | 54,894 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 59,624 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 2013 | 61,213 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 2014 | 61,138 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2015 | 60,011 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 2016 | 59,230 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 2017 | 58,893 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 58,964 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2019 | 59,183 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 59,486 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 59,692 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 59,843 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 60,040 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 60,238 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,354 1000 Int$ | 22,664 1000 Int$ | 33,779 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 34,031 1000 Int$ | 30,946 1000 Int$ | 40,832 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 47,510 1000 Int$ | 37,669 1000 Int$ | 50,427 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 52,841 1000 Int$ | 43,207 1000 Int$ | 58,294 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 55,084 1000 Int$ | 49,159 1000 Int$ | 57,617 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 58,822 1000 Int$ | 54,894 1000 Int$ | 61,213 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 59,860 1000 Int$ | 59,486 1000 Int$ | 60,238 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Peru
- 4 Namibia 82,662 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 201,027 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Papua New Guinea 80,554 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Thailand 61,042 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Melanesia 81,432 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Mexico 40,089 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 13,686 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 10,828 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Nepal 33,445 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Colombia 28,140 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Timor-Leste 5,948 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Peru
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.59 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0747 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 637.02 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.144 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 7.5% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 7.5% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Peru?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Peru was 60,238 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Peru?
- The highest recorded value was 61,213 1000 Int$ in 2013.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Peru?
- The lowest recorded value was 22,664 1000 Int$ in 1964.
- How does Peru rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Peru ranks 7th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Peru?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Peru data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.