Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Nepal
Nepal: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 33,445 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
33,445 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.0%
World rank
9th
of 76 countries
All-time high
35,672 1000 Int$
in 2015
All-time low
8,717 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Nepal, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Nepal is 33,445 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Nepal peaked at 35,672 1000 Int$ in 2015 and was at its lowest, 8,717 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Nepal 9th out of 76 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Nepal, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 8,717 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 9,153 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1963 | 9,588 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1964 | 10,024 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1965 | 10,460 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1966 | 10,896 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1967 | 11,332 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1968 | 11,768 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1969 | 12,204 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1970 | 12,639 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 1971 | 13,075 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1972 | 13,511 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 1973 | 13,729 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1974 | 13,947 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1975 | 14,165 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1976 | 14,383 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1977 | 14,601 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 14,819 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1979 | 15,036 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1980 | 15,254 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1981 | 15,472 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1982 | 15,690 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1983 | 17,216 1000 Int$ | +9.7% |
| 1984 | 31,163 1000 Int$ | +81.0% |
| 1985 | 30,509 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1986 | 31,816 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1987 | 31,163 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1988 | 31,163 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 31,163 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 31,163 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 30,727 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 1992 | 30,727 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 28,330 1000 Int$ | -7.8% |
| 1994 | 26,150 1000 Int$ | -7.7% |
| 1995 | 23,971 1000 Int$ | -8.3% |
| 1996 | 22,882 1000 Int$ | -4.5% |
| 1997 | 22,392 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1998 | 21,792 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1999 | 22,039 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2000 | 22,431 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2001 | 22,882 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2002 | 26,150 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 2003 | 27,240 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 2004 | 27,240 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 27,785 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 28,330 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2007 | 29,201 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2008 | 29,419 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2009 | 33,778 1000 Int$ | +14.8% |
| 2010 | 34,250 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2011 | 34,431 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2012 | 33,995 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 2013 | 33,778 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 33,694 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 35,672 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 2016 | 34,381 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 2017 | 33,951 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 2018 | 33,670 1000 Int$ | -0.8% |
| 2019 | 33,456 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2020 | 33,290 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 2021 | 33,542 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2022 | 33,472 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 2023 | 33,457 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 2024 | 33,445 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,460 1000 Int$ | 8,717 1000 Int$ | 12,204 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 13,990 1000 Int$ | 12,639 1000 Int$ | 15,036 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 25,061 1000 Int$ | 15,254 1000 Int$ | 31,816 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 26,017 1000 Int$ | 21,792 1000 Int$ | 31,163 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 27,446 1000 Int$ | 22,431 1000 Int$ | 33,778 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 34,128 1000 Int$ | 33,456 1000 Int$ | 35,672 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 33,441 1000 Int$ | 33,290 1000 Int$ | 33,542 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Nepal
- 6 Thailand 61,042 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Peru 60,238 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Melanesia 81,432 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Mexico 40,089 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 13,686 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 10,828 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Colombia 28,140 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Timor-Leste 5,948 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Botswana 23,153 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Micronesia 1,395 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Guinea-Bissau 19,084 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Polynesia 1,315 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Nepal
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.5 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2156 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 331.1 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7937 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.33 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 21.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 21.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Nepal?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Nepal was 33,445 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 35,672 1000 Int$ in 2015.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was 8,717 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Nepal rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Nepal ranks 9th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Nepal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.