Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Africa
Southern Africa: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 120,309 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
120,309 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.1%
Rank
9th
of 25 groups
All-time high
120,500 1000 Int$
in 2020
All-time low
40,533 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Africa, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Africa stood at 120,309 1000 Int$.
The figure is down 0.1% on the previous year and up 7.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Africa peaked at 120,500 1000 Int$ in 2020 and was at its lowest, 40,533 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Southern Africa 9th out of 25 groups with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Africa, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 40,533 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 42,712 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1963 | 43,475 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1964 | 45,545 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1965 | 45,981 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1966 | 46,635 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1967 | 47,071 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 1968 | 47,398 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1969 | 48,378 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1970 | 49,250 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1971 | 49,686 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 1972 | 50,339 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1973 | 51,211 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 1974 | 51,538 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1975 | 52,737 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1976 | 53,390 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1977 | 54,371 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1978 | 55,678 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1979 | 56,267 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1980 | 56,398 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1981 | 57,640 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1982 | 59,165 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1983 | 60,146 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 1984 | 61,998 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1985 | 62,652 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1986 | 63,850 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1987 | 65,594 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1988 | 66,945 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1989 | 67,228 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 1990 | 68,536 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1991 | 69,625 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1992 | 66,574 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
| 1993 | 67,991 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1994 | 70,933 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1995 | 73,653 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1996 | 76,163 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1997 | 78,996 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1998 | 80,848 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1999 | 82,374 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2000 | 83,899 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2001 | 88,802 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 2002 | 92,398 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 2003 | 94,509 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 96,782 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 2005 | 99,135 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 2006 | 100,134 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 102,888 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 2008 | 101,254 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 100,346 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 2010 | 104,564 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 2011 | 106,461 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2012 | 108,088 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2013 | 111,030 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 2014 | 112,153 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2015 | 113,555 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2016 | 114,866 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 116,195 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2018 | 117,729 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2019 | 119,414 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2020 | 120,500 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 2021 | 119,644 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2022 | 120,178 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 120,390 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 120,309 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 45,303 1000 Int$ | 40,533 1000 Int$ | 48,378 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 52,447 1000 Int$ | 49,250 1000 Int$ | 56,267 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 62,162 1000 Int$ | 56,398 1000 Int$ | 67,228 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 73,569 1000 Int$ | 66,574 1000 Int$ | 82,374 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 96,015 1000 Int$ | 83,899 1000 Int$ | 102,888 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 112,406 1000 Int$ | 104,564 1000 Int$ | 119,414 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 120,204 1000 Int$ | 119,644 1000 Int$ | 120,500 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Southern Africa
- 6 Thailand 61,042 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Peru 60,238 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Melanesia 81,432 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Mexico 40,089 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 13,686 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 10,828 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Nepal 33,445 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Colombia 28,140 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Timor-Leste 5,948 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Botswana 23,153 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Micronesia 1,395 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Guinea-Bissau 19,084 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Polynesia 1,315 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Southern Africa
- Fruit Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.8158 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.99 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate 0.6002 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Production, annual growth rate 3.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 2.41 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fruit Primary — Production, annual growth rate 0.8425 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fruit Primary — Yield, annual growth rate 1.67 % change on previous year (2024)
- Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 1.8 % change on previous year (2024)
- Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate 1.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- Eggs Primary — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate -9.64 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Africa?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Africa was 120,309 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Southern Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 120,500 1000 Int$ in 2020.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Southern Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 40,533 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Southern Africa rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Southern Africa ranks 9th out of 25 groups with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Southern Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Southern Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.