Alcoholic Beverages — Stock Variation in Mauritius

Mauritius: Alcoholic Beverages — Stock Variation was 140 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
140 t
Change on year
up 40.0%
World rank
33rd
of 145 countries
All-time high
7,948 t
in 2007
All-time low
-3,030 t
in 1999
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Alcoholic Beverages — Stock Variation in Mauritius, 1961–2013

-2.5k02.5k5.0k7.5k196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

Mauritius recorded 140 t for alcoholic beverages — stock variation in 2013.

The figure is up 40.0% on the previous year and up 146.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, alcoholic beverages — stock variation in Mauritius peaked at 7,948 t in 2007 and was at its lowest, -3,030 t, in 1999.

Mauritius ranks 33rd of 145 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t 9
1970s 0 t -500 t 1,100 t 10
1980s -10 t -100 t 0 t 10
1990s -982 t -3,030 t 0 t 10
2000s 958.8 t -1,230 t 7,948 t 10
2010s 20 t -160 t 140 t 4

Countries ranked near Mauritius

  1. 30 Republic of Moldova 500 t compare
  2. 31 Senegal 435 t compare
  3. 32 Saint Kitts and Nevis 300 t compare
  4. 34 Cambodia 40 t compare
  5. 35 Algeria 0 t compare
  6. 35 Angola 0 t compare
  7. 35 Argentina 0 t compare
  8. 35 Azerbaijan 0 t compare
  9. 35 Bahamas 0 t compare
  10. 35 Bangladesh 0 t compare
  11. 35 Belarus 0 t compare
  12. 35 Belgium 0 t compare
  13. 35 Belize 0 t compare
  14. 35 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 t compare
  15. 35 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 t compare
  16. 35 Botswana 0 t compare
  17. 35 Brazil 0 t compare
  18. 35 Bulgaria 0 t compare
  19. 35 Cameroon 0 t compare
  20. 35 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
  21. 35 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
  22. 35 China, mainland 0 t compare
  23. 35 Colombia 0 t compare
  24. 35 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
  25. 35 Cuba 0 t compare
  26. 35 Czechia 0 t compare
  27. 35 Djibouti 0 t compare
  28. 35 Dominica 0 t compare
  29. 35 Egypt 0 t compare
  30. 35 Eswatini 0 t compare
  31. 35 Ethiopia 0 t compare
  32. 35 Fiji 0 t compare
  33. 35 Finland 0 t compare
  34. 35 France 0 t compare
  35. 35 French Polynesia 0 t compare
  36. 35 Gabon 0 t compare
  37. 35 Gambia 0 t compare
  38. 35 Greece 0 t compare
  39. 35 Grenada 0 t compare
  40. 35 Guatemala 0 t compare
  41. 35 Honduras 0 t compare
  42. 35 Iceland 0 t compare
  43. 35 India 0 t compare
  44. 35 Indonesia 0 t compare
  45. 35 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 t compare
  46. 35 Iraq 0 t compare
  47. 35 Jamaica 0 t compare
  48. 35 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
  49. 35 Kenya 0 t compare
  50. 35 Kiribati 0 t compare
  51. 35 Kuwait 0 t compare
  52. 35 Latvia 0 t compare
  53. 35 Lebanon 0 t compare
  54. 35 Liberia 0 t compare
  55. 35 Lithuania 0 t compare
  56. 35 Luxembourg 0 t compare
  57. 35 Malawi 0 t compare
  58. 35 Mali 0 t compare
  59. 35 Malta 0 t compare
  60. 35 Mongolia 0 t compare
  61. 35 Mozambique 0 t compare
  62. 35 Myanmar 0 t compare
  63. 35 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
  64. 35 Netherlands Antilles (former) 0 t compare
  65. 35 Niger 0 t compare
  66. 35 Norway 0 t compare
  67. 35 Paraguay 0 t compare
  68. 35 Poland 0 t compare
  69. 35 Russian Federation 0 t compare
  70. 35 Rwanda 0 t compare
  71. 35 Samoa 0 t compare
  72. 35 Sao Tome and Principe 0 t compare
  73. 35 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
  74. 35 Serbia 0 t compare
  75. 35 Solomon Islands 0 t compare
  76. 35 Suriname 0 t compare
  77. 35 Sweden 0 t compare
  78. 35 Thailand 0 t compare
  79. 35 Togo 0 t compare
  80. 35 Turkmenistan 0 t compare
  81. 35 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
  82. 35 United Republic of Tanzania 0 t compare
  83. 35 Uruguay 0 t compare
  84. 35 Uzbekistan 0 t compare
  85. 35 Vanuatu 0 t compare
  86. 35 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 t compare
  87. 35 Melanesia 0 t compare
  88. 35 Micronesia 0 t compare
  89. 35 Polynesia 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 177 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Mauritius

All data for Mauritius →

Frequently asked questions

What is alcoholic beverages — stock variation in Mauritius?
Alcoholic beverages — stock variation in Mauritius was 140 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest alcoholic beverages — stock variation recorded in Mauritius?
The highest recorded value was 7,948 t in 2007.
What is the lowest alcoholic beverages — stock variation recorded in Mauritius?
The lowest recorded value was -3,030 t in 1999.
How does Mauritius rank for alcoholic beverages — stock variation?
Mauritius ranks 33rd out of 145 countries with data for 2013.
Is alcoholic beverages — stock variation rising or falling in Mauritius?
Over the last ten years it is up 146.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Mauritius data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Alcoholic Beverages — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Alcoholic Beverages — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
177 places, 8,536 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.