Sisal — Import Quantity in Serbia and Montenegro
Serbia and Montenegro: Sisal — Import Quantity was 0 t in 2005. ◆ Volatile
Sisal — Import Quantity in Serbia and Montenegro, 1992–2005
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2005, sisal — import quantity in Serbia and Montenegro stood at 0 t. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, sisal — import quantity in Serbia and Montenegro peaked at 490 t in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1993.
That places Serbia and Montenegro 17th out of 122 countries with data for 2005, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61.25 t | 0 t | 490 t | 8 |
| 2000s | 5 t | 0 t | 10 t | 6 |
Countries ranked near Serbia and Montenegro
- 14 Benin 22 t compare
- 15 Botswana 6 t compare
- 16 Guinea 5 t compare
- 17 Albania 0 t compare
- 17 Algeria 0 t compare
- 17 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
- 17 Argentina 0 t compare
- 17 Australia 0 t compare
- 17 Austria 0 t compare
- 17 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 17 Belgium 0 t compare
- 17 Belize 0 t compare
- 17 Brazil 0 t compare
- 17 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 17 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 17 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 17 Canada 0 t compare
- 17 Chile 0 t compare
- 17 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 17 China, mainland 0 t compare
- 17 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 17 Colombia 0 t compare
- 17 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 17 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 17 Croatia 0 t compare
- 17 Cuba 0 t compare
- 17 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 17 Czechia 0 t compare
- 17 Denmark 0 t compare
- 17 Ecuador 0 t compare
- 17 Egypt 0 t compare
- 17 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 17 Estonia 0 t compare
- 17 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 17 Ethiopia 0 t compare
- 17 Ethiopia PDR 0 t
- 17 Finland 0 t compare
- 17 France 0 t compare
- 17 Gambia 0 t compare
- 17 Germany 0 t compare
- 17 Ghana 0 t compare
- 17 Greece 0 t compare
- 17 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 17 Guyana 0 t compare
- 17 Haiti 0 t compare
- 17 Honduras 0 t compare
- 17 Hungary 0 t compare
- 17 Iceland 0 t compare
- 17 India 0 t compare
- 17 Indonesia 0 t compare
- 17 Ireland 0 t compare
- 17 Israel 0 t compare
- 17 Italy 0 t compare
- 17 Jamaica 0 t compare
- 17 Japan 0 t compare
- 17 Jordan 0 t compare
- 17 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 17 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 17 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 17 Madagascar 0 t compare
- 17 Malawi 0 t compare
- 17 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 17 Mali 0 t compare
- 17 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 17 Mexico 0 t compare
- 17 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 17 Namibia 0 t compare
- 17 Nepal 0 t compare
- 17 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 17 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 17 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 17 Niger 0 t compare
- 17 Norway 0 t compare
- 17 Oman 0 t compare
- 17 Pakistan 0 t compare
- 17 Panama 0 t compare
- 17 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 17 Peru 0 t compare
- 17 Poland 0 t compare
- 17 Portugal 0 t compare
- 17 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 17 Romania 0 t compare
- 17 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 17 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 17 Saint Lucia 0 t compare
- 17 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 17 Senegal 0 t compare
- 17 Slovakia 0 t compare
- 17 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 17 South Africa 0 t compare
- 17 Spain 0 t compare
- 17 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 17 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 17 Sweden 0 t compare
- 17 Switzerland 0 t compare
- 17 Thailand 0 t compare
- 17 Togo 0 t compare
- 17 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 17 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 17 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 17 Uganda 0 t compare
- 17 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 17 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 17 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 17 Yemen 0 t compare
- 17 Zambia 0 t compare
- 17 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
- 17 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Serbia and Montenegro
- Cabbages — Yield 14,534 kg/ha (2005)
- Tomatoes — Yield 8,887 kg/ha (2005)
- Tomatoes — Production 189,929 t (2005)
- Unmanufactured tobacco — Area harvested 7,413 ha (2005)
- Cabbages — Production 335,527 t (2005)
- Unmanufactured tobacco — Production 11,752 t (2005)
- Vegetables Primary — Yield 7,545 kg/ha (2005)
- Vegetables Primary — Production 1.12 million t (2005)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested 21,372 ha (2005)
- Cabbages — Area harvested 23,085 ha (2005)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal — import quantity in Serbia and Montenegro?
- Sisal — import quantity in Serbia and Montenegro was 0 t in 2005, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal — import quantity recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
- The highest recorded value was 490 t in 1992.
- What is the lowest sisal — import quantity recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1993.
- How does Serbia and Montenegro rank for sisal — import quantity?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 17th out of 122 countries with data for 2005.
- Where does this Serbia and Montenegro data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Import Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.