Sisal — Import Quantity in Belize
Belize: Sisal — Import Quantity was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Sisal — Import Quantity in Belize, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
Belize recorded 0 t for sisal — import quantity in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sisal — import quantity in Belize peaked at 9 t in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.
Belize ranks 19th of 128 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.9 t | 0 t | 9 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4 t | 0 t | 2 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belize
- 16 Benin 22 t compare
- 17 Botswana 6 t compare
- 18 Guinea 5 t compare
- 19 Albania 0 t compare
- 19 Algeria 0 t compare
- 19 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
- 19 Argentina 0 t compare
- 19 Australia 0 t compare
- 19 Austria 0 t compare
- 19 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 19 Belgium 0 t compare
- 19 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 t compare
- 19 Brazil 0 t compare
- 19 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 19 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 19 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 19 Canada 0 t compare
- 19 Chile 0 t compare
- 19 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 19 China, mainland 0 t compare
- 19 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 19 Colombia 0 t compare
- 19 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 19 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 19 Croatia 0 t compare
- 19 Cuba 0 t compare
- 19 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 19 Czechia 0 t compare
- 19 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 19 Denmark 0 t compare
- 19 Ecuador 0 t compare
- 19 Egypt 0 t compare
- 19 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 19 Estonia 0 t compare
- 19 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 19 Ethiopia 0 t compare
- 19 Ethiopia PDR 0 t compare
- 19 Finland 0 t compare
- 19 France 0 t compare
- 19 Gambia 0 t compare
- 19 Germany 0 t compare
- 19 Ghana 0 t compare
- 19 Greece 0 t compare
- 19 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 19 Guyana 0 t compare
- 19 Haiti 0 t compare
- 19 Honduras 0 t compare
- 19 Hungary 0 t compare
- 19 Iceland 0 t compare
- 19 India 0 t compare
- 19 Indonesia 0 t compare
- 19 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 t compare
- 19 Ireland 0 t compare
- 19 Israel 0 t compare
- 19 Italy 0 t compare
- 19 Jamaica 0 t compare
- 19 Japan 0 t compare
- 19 Jordan 0 t compare
- 19 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 19 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 19 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 19 Madagascar 0 t compare
- 19 Malawi 0 t compare
- 19 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 19 Mali 0 t compare
- 19 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 19 Mexico 0 t compare
- 19 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 19 Namibia 0 t compare
- 19 Nepal 0 t compare
- 19 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 19 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 19 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 19 Niger 0 t compare
- 19 Norway 0 t compare
- 19 Oman 0 t compare
- 19 Pakistan 0 t compare
- 19 Panama 0 t compare
- 19 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 19 Peru 0 t compare
- 19 Poland 0 t compare
- 19 Portugal 0 t compare
- 19 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 19 Romania 0 t compare
- 19 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 19 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 19 Saint Lucia 0 t compare
- 19 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 19 Senegal 0 t compare
- 19 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
- 19 Slovakia 0 t compare
- 19 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 19 Spain 0 t compare
- 19 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 19 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 19 Sweden 0 t compare
- 19 Switzerland 0 t compare
- 19 Thailand 0 t compare
- 19 Togo 0 t compare
- 19 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 19 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 19 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 19 Uganda 0 t compare
- 19 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 19 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 19 United Republic of Tanzania 0 t compare
- 19 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 19 Viet Nam 0 t compare
- 19 Yemen 0 t compare
- 19 Zambia 0 t compare
- 19 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
- 19 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belize
- Agriculture share gdp 7.95 (2024)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 7.95 (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.9% (2025)
- Rural population 58.4% (2025)
- Rural population growth 1.7% (2025)
- Rural population 247,148 (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 7.9% (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 254.62 million current US$ (2024)
- Bananas — Production 85,072 t (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal — import quantity in Belize?
- Sisal — import quantity in Belize was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal — import quantity recorded in Belize?
- The highest recorded value was 9 t in 1992.
- What is the lowest sisal — import quantity recorded in Belize?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
- How does Belize rank for sisal — import quantity?
- Belize ranks 19th out of 128 countries with data for 2013.
- Is sisal — import quantity rising or falling in Belize?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belize data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Import Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.