Sisal — Import Quantity in Australia and New Zealand
Australia and New Zealand: Sisal — Import Quantity was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Sisal — Import Quantity in Australia and New Zealand, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
Australia and New Zealand recorded 0 t for sisal — import quantity in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sisal — import quantity in Australia and New Zealand peaked at 28,925 t in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 2007.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 17th of 122 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sisal — Import Quantity in Australia and New Zealand, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 28,925 t | — |
| 1962 | 17,106 t | -40.9% |
| 1963 | 25,550 t | +49.4% |
| 1964 | 23,791 t | -6.9% |
| 1965 | 27,360 t | +15.0% |
| 1966 | 24,537 t | -10.3% |
| 1967 | 25,275 t | +3.0% |
| 1968 | 19,540 t | -22.7% |
| 1969 | 24,346 t | +24.6% |
| 1970 | 22,601 t | -7.2% |
| 1971 | 17,351 t | -23.2% |
| 1972 | 21,616 t | +24.6% |
| 1973 | 19,282 t | -10.8% |
| 1974 | 20,221 t | +4.9% |
| 1975 | 11,300 t | -44.1% |
| 1976 | 6,799 t | -39.8% |
| 1977 | 9,576 t | +40.8% |
| 1978 | 9,191 t | -4.0% |
| 1979 | 6,145 t | -33.1% |
| 1980 | 8,249 t | +34.2% |
| 1981 | 4,379 t | -46.9% |
| 1982 | 3,853 t | -12.0% |
| 1983 | 4,336 t | +12.5% |
| 1984 | 5,848 t | +34.9% |
| 1985 | 3,913 t | -33.1% |
| 1986 | 2,246 t | -42.6% |
| 1987 | 1,848 t | -17.7% |
| 1988 | 1,978 t | +7.0% |
| 1989 | 1,442 t | -27.1% |
| 1990 | 2,160 t | +49.8% |
| 1991 | 2,014 t | -6.8% |
| 1992 | 2,055 t | +2.0% |
| 1993 | 1,955 t | -4.9% |
| 1994 | 2,999 t | +53.4% |
| 1995 | 1,756 t | -41.4% |
| 1996 | 1,423 t | -19.0% |
| 1997 | 1,829 t | +28.5% |
| 1998 | 929 t | -49.2% |
| 1999 | 805 t | -13.3% |
| 2000 | 720 t | -10.6% |
| 2001 | 658 t | -8.6% |
| 2002 | 818 t | +24.3% |
| 2003 | 377 t | -53.9% |
| 2004 | 61 t | -83.8% |
| 2005 | 41 t | -32.8% |
| 2006 | 3 t | -92.7% |
| 2007 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2008 | 0 t | — |
| 2009 | 0 t | — |
| 2010 | 0 t | — |
| 2011 | 0 t | — |
| 2012 | 0 t | — |
| 2013 | 0 t | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,048 t | 17,106 t | 28,925 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 14,408 t | 6,145 t | 22,601 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 3,809 t | 1,442 t | 8,249 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,792 t | 805 t | 2,999 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 267.8 t | 0 t | 818 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Australia and New Zealand
- 14 Benin 22 t compare
- 15 Botswana 6 t compare
- 16 Guinea 5 t compare
- 17 Albania 0 t compare
- 17 Algeria 0 t compare
- 17 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
- 17 Argentina 0 t compare
- 17 Australia 0 t compare
- 17 Austria 0 t compare
- 17 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 17 Belgium 0 t compare
- 17 Belize 0 t compare
- 17 Brazil 0 t compare
- 17 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 17 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 17 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 17 Canada 0 t compare
- 17 Chile 0 t compare
- 17 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 17 China, mainland 0 t compare
- 17 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 17 Colombia 0 t compare
- 17 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 17 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 17 Croatia 0 t compare
- 17 Cuba 0 t compare
- 17 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 17 Czechia 0 t compare
- 17 Denmark 0 t compare
- 17 Ecuador 0 t compare
- 17 Egypt 0 t compare
- 17 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 17 Estonia 0 t compare
- 17 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 17 Ethiopia 0 t compare
- 17 Ethiopia PDR 0 t compare
- 17 Finland 0 t compare
- 17 France 0 t compare
- 17 Gambia 0 t compare
- 17 Germany 0 t compare
- 17 Ghana 0 t compare
- 17 Greece 0 t compare
- 17 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 17 Guyana 0 t compare
- 17 Haiti 0 t compare
- 17 Honduras 0 t compare
- 17 Hungary 0 t compare
- 17 Iceland 0 t compare
- 17 India 0 t compare
- 17 Indonesia 0 t compare
- 17 Ireland 0 t compare
- 17 Israel 0 t compare
- 17 Italy 0 t compare
- 17 Jamaica 0 t compare
- 17 Japan 0 t compare
- 17 Jordan 0 t compare
- 17 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 17 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 17 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 17 Madagascar 0 t compare
- 17 Malawi 0 t compare
- 17 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 17 Mali 0 t compare
- 17 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 17 Mexico 0 t compare
- 17 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 17 Namibia 0 t compare
- 17 Nepal 0 t compare
- 17 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 17 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 17 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 17 Niger 0 t compare
- 17 Norway 0 t compare
- 17 Oman 0 t compare
- 17 Pakistan 0 t compare
- 17 Panama 0 t compare
- 17 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 17 Peru 0 t compare
- 17 Poland 0 t compare
- 17 Portugal 0 t compare
- 17 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 17 Romania 0 t compare
- 17 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 17 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 17 Saint Lucia 0 t compare
- 17 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 17 Senegal 0 t compare
- 17 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
- 17 Slovakia 0 t compare
- 17 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 17 South Africa 0 t compare
- 17 Spain 0 t compare
- 17 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 17 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 17 Sweden 0 t compare
- 17 Switzerland 0 t compare
- 17 Thailand 0 t compare
- 17 Togo 0 t compare
- 17 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 17 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 17 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 17 Uganda 0 t compare
- 17 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 17 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 17 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 17 Yemen 0 t compare
- 17 Zambia 0 t compare
- 17 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Australia and New Zealand
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 31.49 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Area harvested 3.98 million ha (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 878,946 1000 An (2024)
- Meat, Total — Production 7.07 million t (2024)
- Milk, Total — Yield/Carcass Weight 5,094 kg/An (2024)
- Milk, Total — Production 30.20 million t (2024)
- Milk, Total — Milk Animals 5.93 million An (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production 4.69 million t (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Yield 679.7 kg/ha (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Area harvested 4.01 million ha (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal — import quantity in Australia and New Zealand?
- Sisal — import quantity in Australia and New Zealand was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal — import quantity recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 28,925 t in 1961.
- What is the lowest sisal — import quantity recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 2007.
- How does Australia and New Zealand rank for sisal — import quantity?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 17th out of 122 countries with data for 2013.
- Is sisal — import quantity rising or falling in Australia and New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Australia and New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Import Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.