Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Serbia
Serbia: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 114.95 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Serbia, 2015–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Analysis
In 2024, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Serbia stood at 114.95.
That represents a change of up 0.9% on the previous year and up 90.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Serbia peaked at 139.78 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 60.22, in 2015.
Serbia ranks 9th of 63 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 60.22 | — |
| 2016 | 139.78 | +132.1% |
| 2017 | 105.73 | -24.4% |
| 2018 | 103.33 | -2.3% |
| 2019 | 117.26 | +13.5% |
| 2020 | 110.51 | -5.8% |
| 2021 | 112.43 | +1.7% |
| 2022 | 115.28 | +2.5% |
| 2023 | 113.92 | -1.2% |
| 2024 | 114.95 | +0.9% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 114.95 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 94.34, 1.2× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 105.26 | 60.22 | 139.78 | 5 |
| 2020s | 113.42 | 110.51 | 115.28 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 6 France 118.93
- 7 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 84.1 compare
- 7 Slovenia 116.63
- 8 Timor-Leste 81.37 compare
- 8 Tuvalu 116.36 compare
- 9 United Republic of Tanzania 79.58 compare
- 10 Spain 109.39
- 10 Melanesia 77.54 compare
- 11 Tonga 108.61 compare
- 12 China 108.28 compare
- 12 Democratic Republic of the Congo 75.77 compare
More agriculture & rural data for Serbia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 14.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0328 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 501.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3736 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.0% (2007)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.6% (2007)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Serbia?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Serbia was 114.95 in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 139.78 in 2016.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 60.22 in 2015.
- How does Serbia rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Serbia ranks 9th out of 63 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 90.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.