Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Other uses in Belarus, Republic of

Belarus, Republic of: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Other uses was 0 1000 t in 2018. β—† Volatile

Latest (2018)
0 1000 t
World rank
24th
of 78 countries
All-time high
66 1000 t
in 2013
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2014
Years of data
9
2010–2018

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Other uses in Belarus, Republic of, 2010–2018

02040602010201420182010: 23 1000 t2011: 42 1000 t2012: 25 1000 t2013: 66 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Belarus, Republic of recorded 0 1000 t for sugar (raw equivalent) β€” other uses in 2018. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sugar (raw equivalent) β€” other uses in Belarus, Republic of peaked at 66 1000 t in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2014.

Belarus, Republic of ranks 24th of 78 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Belarus, Republic of

  1. 21 Montenegro 3 1000 t compare
  2. 21 Slovenia, Republic of 3 1000 t compare
  3. 23 Paraguay 1 1000 t compare
  4. 24 Tonga 0 1000 t
  5. 24 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  6. 24 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  7. 24 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  8. 24 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  9. 24 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  10. 24 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  11. 24 Armenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  12. 24 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  13. 24 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  14. 24 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  15. 24 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
  16. 24 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  17. 24 St. Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  18. 24 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  19. 24 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  20. 24 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  21. 24 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  22. 24 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  23. 24 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  24. 24 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  25. 24 Gambia, The 0 1000 t compare
  26. 24 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  27. 24 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  28. 24 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  29. 24 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  30. 24 Latvia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  31. 24 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  32. 24 Lithuania, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  33. 24 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  34. 24 Czech Republic 0 1000 t compare
  35. 24 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  36. 24 Fiji, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  37. 24 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  38. 24 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  39. 24 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  40. 24 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  41. 24 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  42. 24 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  43. 24 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  44. 24 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  45. 24 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  46. 24 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  47. 24 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  48. 24 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  49. 24 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  50. 24 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  51. 24 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  52. 24 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  53. 24 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  54. 24 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  55. 24 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  56. 24 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  57. 24 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 115 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Belarus, Republic of

All data for Belarus, Republic of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar (raw equivalent) β€” other uses in Belarus, Republic of?
Sugar (raw equivalent) β€” other uses in Belarus, Republic of was 0 1000 t in 2018, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sugar (raw equivalent) β€” other uses recorded in Belarus, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 66 1000 t in 2013.
What is the lowest sugar (raw equivalent) β€” other uses recorded in Belarus, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2014.
How does Belarus, Republic of rank for sugar (raw equivalent) β€” other uses?
Belarus, Republic of ranks 24th out of 78 countries with data for 2018.
Is sugar (raw equivalent) β€” other uses rising or falling in Belarus, Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Other uses in Belarus, Republic of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-raw-equivalent-other-uses-non-food/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-raw-equivalent-other-uses-non-food/belarus/">Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Other uses in Belarus, Republic of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Other uses (non-food)
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
115 places, 1,321 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.