Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Land locked developing countries

Land locked developing countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses was 2,544 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
2,544 t
Change on year
up 5.4%
Rank
3rd
of 13 regions
All-time high
7,516 t
in 2000
All-time low
200 t
in 1961
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Land locked developing countries, 1961–2013

02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

In 2013, soft-fibres, other — other uses in Land locked developing countries stood at 2,544 t.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.4% on the previous year and up 75.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, soft-fibres, other — other uses in Land locked developing countries peaked at 7,516 t in 2000 and was at its lowest, 200 t, in 1961.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Land locked developing countries, year by year

Annual values for Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food) in Land locked developing countries, 1961 to 2013.
Year t Change
1961 200 t
1962 300 t +50.0%
1963 300 t +0.0%
1964 280 t -6.7%
1965 280 t +0.0%
1966 280 t +0.0%
1967 304 t +8.6%
1968 304 t +0.0%
1969 320 t +5.3%
1970 320 t +0.0%
1971 330 t +3.1%
1972 340 t +3.0%
1973 350 t +2.9%
1974 552 t +57.7%
1975 300 t -45.7%
1976 320 t +6.7%
1977 302 t -5.6%
1978 292 t -3.3%
1979 351 t +20.2%
1980 400 t +14.0%
1981 450 t +12.5%
1982 504 t +12.0%
1983 600 t +19.0%
1984 658 t +9.7%
1985 700 t +6.4%
1986 780 t +11.4%
1987 824 t +5.6%
1988 827 t +0.4%
1989 860 t +4.0%
1990 1,009 t +17.3%
1991 1,144 t +13.4%
1992 1,235 t +8.0%
1993 1,311 t +6.2%
1994 1,458 t +11.2%
1995 1,670 t +14.5%
1996 2,874 t +72.1%
1997 1,510 t -47.5%
1998 1,852 t +22.6%
1999 3,913 t +111.3%
2000 7,516 t +92.1%
2001 1,783 t -76.3%
2002 1,952 t +9.5%
2003 1,452 t -25.6%
2004 1,504 t +3.6%
2005 2,004 t +33.2%
2006 2,194 t +9.5%
2007 2,658 t +21.1%
2008 2,569 t -3.3%
2009 2,495 t -2.9%
2010 2,305 t -7.6%
2011 2,381 t +3.3%
2012 2,413 t +1.3%
2013 2,544 t +5.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 285.33 t 200 t 320 t 9
1970s 345.7 t 292 t 552 t 10
1980s 660.3 t 400 t 860 t 10
1990s 1,798 t 1,009 t 3,913 t 10
2000s 2,613 t 1,452 t 7,516 t 10
2010s 2,411 t 2,305 t 2,544 t 4

Countries ranked near Land locked developing countries

  1. 1 USSR 343,990 t compare
  2. 2 China, mainland 293,874 t compare
  3. 3 Indonesia 66,309 t compare
  4. 4 Russian Federation 47,868 t compare
  5. 5 Belgium 39,264 t compare
  6. 6 Belgium-Luxembourg 37,110 t compare

See the full ranking of 178 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land locked developing countries

All data for Land locked developing countries →

Frequently asked questions

What is soft-fibres, other — other uses in Land locked developing countries?
Soft-fibres, other — other uses in Land locked developing countries was 2,544 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest soft-fibres, other — other uses recorded in Land locked developing countries?
The highest recorded value was 7,516 t in 2000.
What is the lowest soft-fibres, other — other uses recorded in Land locked developing countries?
The lowest recorded value was 200 t in 1961.
How does Land locked developing countries rank for soft-fibres, other — other uses?
Land locked developing countries ranks 3rd out of 13 regions with data for 2013.
Is soft-fibres, other — other uses rising or falling in Land locked developing countries?
Over the last ten years it is up 75.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land locked developing countries data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Land locked developing countries. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/soft-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/soft-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries/">Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses in Land locked developing countries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
178 places, 8,520 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.