Indonesia vs Land locked developing countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses

Indonesia
66,309 t
in 2013
Land locked developing countries
2,544 t
in 2013
Indonesia rank
3rd
Land locked developing countries rank
3rd

Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses over time

  • Indonesia
  • Land locked developing countries
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119872013

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 66,309 t against 2,544 t in Land locked developing countries, a difference of 63,765 t.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 26.1 times Land locked developing countries's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 3rd and Land locked developing countries ranks 3rd of 137 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Land locked developing countries Difference Ahead
1960s 27,405 t 285.33 t 27,119 t Indonesia
1970s 31,403 t 345.7 t 31,057 t Indonesia
1980s 55,801 t 660.3 t 55,140 t Indonesia
1990s 72,944 t 1,798 t 71,146 t Indonesia
2000s 68,330 t 2,613 t 65,717 t Indonesia
2010s 62,923 t 2,411 t 60,512 t Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other — other uses, Indonesia or Land locked developing countries?
Indonesia, at 66,309 t against 2,544 t in Land locked developing countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — other uses between Indonesia and Land locked developing countries?
63,765 t, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Land locked developing countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Indonesia and Land locked developing countries rank globally for soft-fibres, other — other uses?
Indonesia ranks 3rd and Land locked developing countries ranks 3rd of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Land locked developing countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/indonesia/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-other-uses-non-food/indonesia/land-locked-developing-countries/">Indonesia vs Land locked developing countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
178 places, 8,520 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.