Sisal — Domestic supply quantity in Thailand
Thailand: Sisal — Domestic supply quantity was 13 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Sisal — Domestic supply quantity in Thailand, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for sisal — domestic supply quantity in Thailand is 13 t, measured in 2013.
The figure is down 94.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sisal — domestic supply quantity in Thailand peaked at 599 t in 1993 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.
That places Thailand 31st out of 125 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 28.6 t | 22 t | 35 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 131.9 t | 50 t | 353 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 294.9 t | 126 t | 599 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 164.6 t | 14 t | 302 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 14.25 t | 13 t | 16 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Thailand
- 28 Cameroon 65 t compare
- 29 Dominican Republic 55 t compare
- 30 Benin 22 t compare
- 32 Botswana 6 t compare
- 33 Albania 0 t compare
- 33 Algeria 0 t compare
- 33 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
- 33 Argentina 0 t compare
- 33 Australia 0 t compare
- 33 Austria 0 t compare
- 33 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 33 Belgium 0 t compare
- 33 Belize 0 t compare
- 33 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 33 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 33 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 33 Canada 0 t compare
- 33 Chile 0 t compare
- 33 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 33 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 33 Colombia 0 t compare
- 33 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 33 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 33 Croatia 0 t compare
- 33 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 33 Czechia 0 t compare
- 33 Denmark 0 t compare
- 33 Ecuador 0 t compare
- 33 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 t compare
- 33 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 33 Estonia 0 t compare
- 33 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 t compare
- 33 Finland 0 t compare
- 33 France 0 t compare
- 33 Gambia, The 0 t compare
- 33 Germany 0 t compare
- 33 Ghana 0 t compare
- 33 Greece 0 t compare
- 33 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 33 Guyana 0 t compare
- 33 Honduras 0 t compare
- 33 Hungary 0 t compare
- 33 Iceland 0 t compare
- 33 India 0 t compare
- 33 Ireland 0 t compare
- 33 Israel 0 t compare
- 33 Italy 0 t compare
- 33 Japan 0 t compare
- 33 Jordan 0 t compare
- 33 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 t compare
- 33 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 33 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 33 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 33 Mali 0 t compare
- 33 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 t compare
- 33 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 33 Namibia 0 t compare
- 33 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 33 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 33 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 33 Niger 0 t compare
- 33 Norway 0 t compare
- 33 Oman 0 t compare
- 33 Pakistan 0 t compare
- 33 Panama 0 t compare
- 33 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 33 Peru 0 t compare
- 33 Poland 0 t compare
- 33 Portugal 0 t compare
- 33 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 33 Romania 0 t compare
- 33 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 33 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 33 St. Lucia 0 t compare
- 33 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 33 Senegal 0 t compare
- 33 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
- 33 Slovak Republic 0 t compare
- 33 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 33 Spain 0 t compare
- 33 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 33 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 33 Sweden 0 t compare
- 33 Switzerland 0 t compare
- 33 Togo 0 t compare
- 33 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 33 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 33 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 33 Uganda 0 t compare
- 33 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 33 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 33 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 33 Yemen, Republic of 0 t compare
- 33 Zambia 0 t compare
- 33 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
- 33 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Thailand
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 7.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0875 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 704.7 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.51 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.372 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 8.75 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 8.75 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal — domestic supply quantity in Thailand?
- Sisal — domestic supply quantity in Thailand was 13 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal — domestic supply quantity recorded in Thailand?
- The highest recorded value was 599 t in 1993.
- What is the lowest sisal — domestic supply quantity recorded in Thailand?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
- How does Thailand rank for sisal — domestic supply quantity?
- Thailand ranks 31st out of 125 countries with data for 2013.
- Is sisal — domestic supply quantity rising or falling in Thailand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 94.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Thailand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.