Sisal — Domestic supply quantity in Serbia and Montenegro
Serbia and Montenegro: Sisal — Domestic supply quantity was 0 t in 2005. ◆ Volatile
Sisal — Domestic supply quantity in Serbia and Montenegro, 1992–2005
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2005, sisal — domestic supply quantity in Serbia and Montenegro stood at 0 t. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, sisal — domestic supply quantity in Serbia and Montenegro peaked at 490 t in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1993.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 33rd of 125 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sisal — Domestic supply quantity in Serbia and Montenegro, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 490 t | — |
| 1993 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1994 | 0 t | — |
| 1995 | 0 t | — |
| 1996 | 0 t | — |
| 1997 | 0 t | — |
| 1998 | 0 t | — |
| 1999 | 0 t | — |
| 2000 | 9 t | — |
| 2001 | 7 t | -22.2% |
| 2002 | 10 t | +42.9% |
| 2003 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2004 | 4 t | — |
| 2005 | 0 t | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61.25 t | 0 t | 490 t | 8 |
| 2000s | 5 t | 0 t | 10 t | 6 |
Countries ranked near Serbia and Montenegro
- 30 Benin 22 t compare
- 31 Thailand 13 t compare
- 32 Botswana 6 t compare
- 33 Albania 0 t compare
- 33 Algeria 0 t compare
- 33 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
- 33 Argentina 0 t compare
- 33 Australia 0 t compare
- 33 Austria 0 t compare
- 33 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 33 Belgium 0 t compare
- 33 Belize 0 t compare
- 33 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 33 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 33 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 33 Canada 0 t compare
- 33 Chile 0 t compare
- 33 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 33 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 33 Colombia 0 t compare
- 33 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 33 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 33 Croatia 0 t compare
- 33 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 33 Czechia 0 t compare
- 33 Denmark 0 t compare
- 33 Ecuador 0 t compare
- 33 Egypt 0 t compare
- 33 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 33 Estonia 0 t compare
- 33 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 33 Finland 0 t compare
- 33 France 0 t compare
- 33 Gambia 0 t compare
- 33 Germany 0 t compare
- 33 Ghana 0 t compare
- 33 Greece 0 t compare
- 33 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 33 Guyana 0 t compare
- 33 Honduras 0 t compare
- 33 Hungary 0 t compare
- 33 Iceland 0 t compare
- 33 India 0 t compare
- 33 Ireland 0 t compare
- 33 Israel 0 t compare
- 33 Italy 0 t compare
- 33 Japan 0 t compare
- 33 Jordan 0 t compare
- 33 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 33 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 33 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 33 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 33 Mali 0 t compare
- 33 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 33 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 33 Namibia 0 t compare
- 33 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 33 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 33 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 33 Niger 0 t compare
- 33 Norway 0 t compare
- 33 Oman 0 t compare
- 33 Pakistan 0 t compare
- 33 Panama 0 t compare
- 33 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 33 Peru 0 t compare
- 33 Poland 0 t compare
- 33 Portugal 0 t compare
- 33 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 33 Romania 0 t compare
- 33 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 33 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 33 Saint Lucia 0 t compare
- 33 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 33 Senegal 0 t compare
- 33 Slovakia 0 t compare
- 33 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 33 Spain 0 t compare
- 33 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 33 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 33 Sweden 0 t compare
- 33 Switzerland 0 t compare
- 33 Togo 0 t compare
- 33 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 33 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 33 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 33 Uganda 0 t compare
- 33 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 33 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 33 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 33 Yemen 0 t compare
- 33 Zambia 0 t compare
- 33 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
- 33 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Serbia and Montenegro
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight 5.19 % change on previous year (2005)
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate -8.47 % change on previous year (2005)
- Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate -6.43 % change on previous year (2005)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing -0.3105 % change on previous year (2005)
- Fat of pigs — Production, annual growth rate -0.3105 % change on previous year (2005)
- Fat of pigs — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate -0.3105 % change on previous year (2005)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing -0.3105 % change on previous year (2005)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate -2.18 % change on previous year (2005)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks, annual growth rate -8.26 % change on previous year (2005)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Yield, annual growth rate 10.24 % change on previous year (2005)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal — domestic supply quantity in Serbia and Montenegro?
- Sisal — domestic supply quantity in Serbia and Montenegro was 0 t in 2005, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal — domestic supply quantity recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
- The highest recorded value was 490 t in 1992.
- What is the lowest sisal — domestic supply quantity recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1993.
- How does Serbia and Montenegro rank for sisal — domestic supply quantity?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 33rd out of 125 countries with data for 2005.
- Where does this Serbia and Montenegro data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.