Sisal — Domestic supply quantity in Namibia
Namibia: Sisal — Domestic supply quantity was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Sisal — Domestic supply quantity in Namibia, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, sisal — domestic supply quantity in Namibia stood at 0 t. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sisal — domestic supply quantity in Namibia peaked at 41 t in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.
That places Namibia 34th out of 130 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.9 t | 0 t | 41 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
- 31 Benin 22 t compare
- 32 Thailand 13 t compare
- 33 Botswana 6 t compare
- 34 Albania 0 t compare
- 34 Algeria 0 t compare
- 34 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
- 34 Argentina 0 t compare
- 34 Australia 0 t compare
- 34 Austria 0 t compare
- 34 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 34 Belgium 0 t compare
- 34 Belize 0 t compare
- 34 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 t compare
- 34 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 34 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 34 Canada 0 t compare
- 34 Chile 0 t compare
- 34 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 34 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 34 Colombia 0 t compare
- 34 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 34 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 34 Croatia 0 t compare
- 34 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 34 Czechia 0 t compare
- 34 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 34 Denmark 0 t compare
- 34 Ecuador 0 t compare
- 34 Egypt 0 t compare
- 34 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 34 Estonia 0 t compare
- 34 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 34 Finland 0 t compare
- 34 France 0 t compare
- 34 Gambia 0 t compare
- 34 Germany 0 t compare
- 34 Ghana 0 t compare
- 34 Greece 0 t compare
- 34 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 34 Guyana 0 t compare
- 34 Honduras 0 t compare
- 34 Hungary 0 t compare
- 34 Iceland 0 t compare
- 34 India 0 t compare
- 34 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 t compare
- 34 Ireland 0 t compare
- 34 Israel 0 t compare
- 34 Italy 0 t compare
- 34 Japan 0 t compare
- 34 Jordan 0 t compare
- 34 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 34 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 34 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 34 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 34 Mali 0 t compare
- 34 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 34 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 34 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 34 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 34 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 34 Niger 0 t compare
- 34 Norway 0 t compare
- 34 Oman 0 t compare
- 34 Pakistan 0 t compare
- 34 Panama 0 t compare
- 34 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 34 Peru 0 t compare
- 34 Poland 0 t compare
- 34 Portugal 0 t compare
- 34 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 34 Romania 0 t compare
- 34 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 34 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 34 Saint Lucia 0 t compare
- 34 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 34 Senegal 0 t compare
- 34 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
- 34 Slovakia 0 t compare
- 34 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 34 Spain 0 t compare
- 34 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 34 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 34 Sweden 0 t compare
- 34 Switzerland 0 t compare
- 34 Togo 0 t compare
- 34 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 34 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 34 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 34 Uganda 0 t compare
- 34 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 34 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 34 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 34 Viet Nam 0 t compare
- 34 Yemen 0 t compare
- 34 Zambia 0 t compare
- 34 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
- 34 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Namibia
- Agriculture share gdp 6.99 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 6.99 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.5% (2024)
- Rural population 49.1% (2025)
- Rural population growth 1.1% (2025)
- Rural population 1.52 million (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 7.0% (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 1.05 billion current US$ (2025)
- Tomatoes — Production 8,862 t (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal — domestic supply quantity in Namibia?
- Sisal — domestic supply quantity in Namibia was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal — domestic supply quantity recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 41 t in 2002.
- What is the lowest sisal — domestic supply quantity recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
- How does Namibia rank for sisal — domestic supply quantity?
- Namibia ranks 34th out of 130 countries with data for 2013.
- Is sisal — domestic supply quantity rising or falling in Namibia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.