Silk — Other uses in Southern Europe
Southern Europe: Silk — Other uses was 1,291 t in 2013. ▼ Falling
Silk — Other uses in Southern Europe, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, silk — other uses in Southern Europe stood at 1,291 t.
The figure is up 10.8% on the previous year and down 63.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, silk — other uses in Southern Europe peaked at 12,276 t in 1961 and was at its lowest, 1,044 t, in 2009.
Southern Europe ranks 14th of 28 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 53 years of available data.
Silk — Other uses in Southern Europe, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 12,276 t | — |
| 1962 | 11,385 t | -7.3% |
| 1963 | 9,597 t | -15.7% |
| 1964 | 8,042 t | -16.2% |
| 1965 | 6,826 t | -15.1% |
| 1966 | 6,715 t | -1.6% |
| 1967 | 7,563 t | +12.6% |
| 1968 | 7,324 t | -3.2% |
| 1969 | 6,953 t | -5.1% |
| 1970 | 6,159 t | -11.4% |
| 1971 | 4,252 t | -31.0% |
| 1972 | 3,694 t | -13.1% |
| 1973 | 4,374 t | +18.4% |
| 1974 | 3,928 t | -10.2% |
| 1975 | 4,731 t | +20.4% |
| 1976 | 5,655 t | +19.5% |
| 1977 | 6,345 t | +12.2% |
| 1978 | 6,787 t | +7.0% |
| 1979 | 7,317 t | +7.8% |
| 1980 | 4,416 t | -39.6% |
| 1981 | 5,073 t | +14.9% |
| 1982 | 6,758 t | +33.2% |
| 1983 | 7,063 t | +4.5% |
| 1984 | 6,741 t | -4.6% |
| 1985 | 6,893 t | +2.3% |
| 1986 | 7,639 t | +10.8% |
| 1987 | 7,663 t | +0.3% |
| 1988 | 8,282 t | +8.1% |
| 1989 | 7,941 t | -4.1% |
| 1990 | 5,112 t | -35.6% |
| 1991 | 5,679 t | +11.1% |
| 1992 | 4,486 t | -21.0% |
| 1993 | 5,745 t | +28.1% |
| 1994 | 9,489 t | +65.2% |
| 1995 | 5,570 t | -41.3% |
| 1996 | 4,431 t | -20.4% |
| 1997 | 5,729 t | +29.3% |
| 1998 | 4,177 t | -27.1% |
| 1999 | 5,293 t | +26.7% |
| 2000 | 6,078 t | +14.8% |
| 2001 | 4,812 t | -20.8% |
| 2002 | 3,232 t | -32.8% |
| 2003 | 3,501 t | +8.3% |
| 2004 | 2,550 t | -27.2% |
| 2005 | 3,136 t | +23.0% |
| 2006 | 1,691 t | -46.1% |
| 2007 | 2,031 t | +20.1% |
| 2008 | 1,942 t | -4.4% |
| 2009 | 1,044 t | -46.2% |
| 2010 | 1,254 t | +20.1% |
| 2011 | 1,332 t | +6.2% |
| 2012 | 1,165 t | -12.5% |
| 2013 | 1,291 t | +10.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,520 t | 6,715 t | 12,276 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 5,324 t | 3,694 t | 7,317 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 6,847 t | 4,416 t | 8,282 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 5,571 t | 4,177 t | 9,489 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 3,002 t | 1,044 t | 6,078 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,260 t | 1,165 t | 1,332 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Southern Europe
- 11 Japan 1,159 t compare
- 12 Afghanistan 750 t compare
- 13 Republic of Korea 414 t compare
- 14 France 280 t compare
- 15 T�rkiye 255 t compare
- 16 Yugoslav SFR 225 t compare
- 17 Bangladesh 218 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Southern Europe
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual 2.08 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate 2.78 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate 1.92 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate 4.75 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual 1.95 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing 0.8895 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Production, annual growth rate 2.35 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate 0.8895 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight 1.1 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing 0.8895 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is silk — other uses in Southern Europe?
- Silk — other uses in Southern Europe was 1,291 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest silk — other uses recorded in Southern Europe?
- The highest recorded value was 12,276 t in 1961.
- What is the lowest silk — other uses recorded in Southern Europe?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,044 t in 2009.
- How does Southern Europe rank for silk — other uses?
- Southern Europe ranks 14th out of 28 groups with data for 2013.
- Is silk — other uses rising or falling in Southern Europe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 63.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Southern Europe data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.