Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 1.38 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
1.38 million 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 4.5%
Rank
2nd
of 13 groups
All-time high
1.38 million 1000 Int$
in 2024
All-time low
113,071 1000 Int$
in 1993
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) stood at 1.38 million 1000 Int$. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
That represents a change of up 4.5% on the previous year and up 98.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) peaked at 1.38 million 1000 Int$ in 2024 and was at its lowest, 113,071 1000 Int$, in 1993.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 123,735 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 124,650 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1963 | 126,764 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 1964 | 128,028 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1965 | 130,469 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1966 | 134,892 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1967 | 138,096 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1968 | 142,890 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1969 | 144,917 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1970 | 148,403 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1971 | 152,675 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1972 | 157,098 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1973 | 168,975 1000 Int$ | +7.6% |
| 1974 | 192,641 1000 Int$ | +14.0% |
| 1975 | 224,959 1000 Int$ | +16.8% |
| 1976 | 247,971 1000 Int$ | +10.2% |
| 1977 | 296,957 1000 Int$ | +19.8% |
| 1978 | 338,185 1000 Int$ | +13.9% |
| 1979 | 386,480 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1980 | 408,046 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 1981 | 429,487 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1982 | 452,234 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1983 | 478,334 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 1984 | 448,980 1000 Int$ | -6.1% |
| 1985 | 470,626 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1986 | 517,143 1000 Int$ | +9.9% |
| 1987 | 541,258 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1988 | 581,500 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1989 | 558,242 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1990 | 631,986 1000 Int$ | +13.2% |
| 1991 | 603,030 1000 Int$ | -4.6% |
| 1992 | 657,061 1000 Int$ | +9.0% |
| 1993 | 113,071 1000 Int$ | -82.8% |
| 1994 | 118,120 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1995 | 124,174 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 1996 | 130,407 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1997 | 138,745 1000 Int$ | +6.4% |
| 1998 | 158,597 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1999 | 167,985 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 2000 | 175,666 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2001 | 185,224 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 2002 | 197,321 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 2003 | 207,002 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 2004 | 216,582 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2005 | 226,768 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 2006 | 232,480 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 2007 | 240,311 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 2008 | 245,840 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2009 | 335,401 1000 Int$ | +36.4% |
| 2010 | 422,317 1000 Int$ | +25.9% |
| 2011 | 517,915 1000 Int$ | +22.6% |
| 2012 | 566,474 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 2013 | 601,809 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 2014 | 693,035 1000 Int$ | +15.2% |
| 2015 | 908,632 1000 Int$ | +31.1% |
| 2016 | 899,209 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
| 2017 | 847,253 1000 Int$ | -5.8% |
| 2018 | 1.06 million 1000 Int$ | +25.6% |
| 2019 | 1.07 million 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 1.15 million 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 2021 | 1.14 million 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 2022 | 1.21 million 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 2023 | 1.32 million 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 2024 | 1.38 million 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 132,716 1000 Int$ | 123,735 1000 Int$ | 144,917 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 231,434 1000 Int$ | 148,403 1000 Int$ | 386,480 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 488,585 1000 Int$ | 408,046 1000 Int$ | 581,500 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 284,318 1000 Int$ | 113,071 1000 Int$ | 657,061 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 226,260 1000 Int$ | 175,666 1000 Int$ | 335,401 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 758,822 1000 Int$ | 422,317 1000 Int$ | 1.07 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.24 million 1000 Int$ | 1.14 million 1000 Int$ | 1.38 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- 1 Ethiopia PDR 566,591 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Pakistan 140,162 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Indonesia 83,732 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1.08 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Namibia 82,662 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 201,027 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Papua New Guinea 80,554 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Meat, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate 0.688 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.9631 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Milk Animals, annual growth rate 1.12 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Production, annual growth rate 2.41 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 0.9901 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Production, annual growth rate 1.65 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fruit Primary — Production, annual growth rate 2.56 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 0.6381 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production, annual growth rate -0.2985 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) was 1.38 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 1.38 million 1000 Int$ in 2024.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 113,071 1000 Int$ in 1993.
- How does Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd out of 13 groups with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 98.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Least Developed Countries (LDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.