Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Eswatini
Eswatini: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 14,495 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
14,495 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.2%
World rank
13th
of 76 countries
All-time high
14,676 1000 Int$
in 2019
All-time low
3,487 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Eswatini, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Eswatini stood at 14,495 1000 Int$.
The figure is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 9.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Eswatini peaked at 14,676 1000 Int$ in 2019 and was at its lowest, 3,487 1000 Int$, in 1961.
Eswatini ranks 13th of 76 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3,487 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 3,487 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 3,596 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1964 | 3,705 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 1965 | 3,705 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1967 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 4,032 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1969 | 4,140 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1970 | 4,140 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 4,358 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1972 | 4,576 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1973 | 4,576 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 4,685 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1975 | 4,794 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1976 | 5,012 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1977 | 5,339 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 1978 | 5,339 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 5,492 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1980 | 5,622 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1981 | 5,775 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1982 | 5,993 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1983 | 6,102 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1984 | 6,647 1000 Int$ | +8.9% |
| 1985 | 6,647 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 6,973 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 1987 | 7,191 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1988 | 7,453 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 1989 | 7,736 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1990 | 7,954 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1991 | 8,172 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1992 | 8,390 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1993 | 8,608 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 8,826 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1995 | 8,930 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1996 | 9,044 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1997 | 9,262 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1998 | 9,371 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1999 | 9,588 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2000 | 9,806 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2001 | 9,915 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 10,024 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 10,074 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2004 | 10,133 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2005 | 10,242 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2006 | 10,024 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 2007 | 10,490 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2008 | 11,228 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 2009 | 11,768 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 2010 | 11,986 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2011 | 12,410 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 2012 | 12,857 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 2013 | 13,075 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 13,300 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2015 | 13,571 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2016 | 13,846 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2017 | 14,123 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2018 | 14,399 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 14,676 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2020 | 14,399 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 2021 | 14,491 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2022 | 14,522 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2023 | 14,471 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 2024 | 14,495 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,778 1000 Int$ | 3,487 1000 Int$ | 4,140 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 4,831 1000 Int$ | 4,140 1000 Int$ | 5,492 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 6,614 1000 Int$ | 5,622 1000 Int$ | 7,736 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 8,814 1000 Int$ | 7,954 1000 Int$ | 9,588 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 10,370 1000 Int$ | 9,806 1000 Int$ | 11,768 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 13,424 1000 Int$ | 11,986 1000 Int$ | 14,676 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 14,476 1000 Int$ | 14,399 1000 Int$ | 14,522 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 10 Colombia 28,140 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Timor-Leste 5,948 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Botswana 23,153 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Micronesia 1,395 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Guinea-Bissau 19,084 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Polynesia 1,315 1000 Int$ compare
- 13 United Republic of Tanzania 484 1000 Int$ compare
- 14 Congo 13,803 1000 Int$ compare
- 15 France 13,582 1000 Int$ compare
- 16 Haiti 13,340 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Eswatini
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 5.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0641 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 263.26 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4281 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.7328 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 6.2% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.9% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Eswatini?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Eswatini was 14,495 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 14,676 1000 Int$ in 2019.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 3,487 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Eswatini rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Eswatini ranks 13th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.