Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Congo
Congo: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 13,803 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
13,803 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.5%
World rank
14th
of 76 countries
All-time high
13,936 1000 Int$
in 2021
All-time low
3,487 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Congo, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Congo is 13,803 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 9.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Congo peaked at 13,936 1000 Int$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, 3,487 1000 Int$, in 1961.
Congo ranks 14th of 76 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Congo, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3,487 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 3,596 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1963 | 3,705 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 1964 | 3,705 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1966 | 4,032 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1967 | 4,140 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1968 | 4,228 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1969 | 4,293 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1970 | 4,358 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1971 | 4,358 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 4,467 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1973 | 4,576 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1974 | 4,794 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1975 | 4,948 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 1976 | 4,969 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 1977 | 4,989 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 1978 | 4,489 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1979 | 4,555 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1980 | 4,620 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1981 | 4,685 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1982 | 5,012 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 1983 | 5,230 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1984 | 5,448 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1985 | 5,666 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1986 | 5,884 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1987 | 6,102 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1988 | 6,320 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 1989 | 6,973 1000 Int$ | +10.3% |
| 1990 | 7,409 1000 Int$ | +6.3% |
| 1991 | 6,973 1000 Int$ | -5.9% |
| 1992 | 7,409 1000 Int$ | +6.3% |
| 1993 | 7,845 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1994 | 8,281 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 1995 | 8,717 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1996 | 9,153 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1997 | 8,717 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1998 | 8,152 1000 Int$ | -6.5% |
| 1999 | 7,627 1000 Int$ | -6.4% |
| 2000 | 7,769 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2001 | 8,001 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 8,281 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 2003 | 8,544 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 2004 | 8,694 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2005 | 8,717 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2006 | 8,556 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 2007 | 8,281 1000 Int$ | -3.2% |
| 2008 | 8,717 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2009 | 10,311 1000 Int$ | +18.3% |
| 2010 | 11,986 1000 Int$ | +16.2% |
| 2011 | 12,204 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2012 | 12,421 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 12,530 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 2014 | 12,588 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2015 | 12,812 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2016 | 13,060 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2017 | 13,297 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 13,528 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2019 | 13,755 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2020 | 13,527 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 2021 | 13,936 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2022 | 13,739 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 2023 | 13,734 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 2024 | 13,803 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,901 1000 Int$ | 3,487 1000 Int$ | 4,293 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 4,650 1000 Int$ | 4,358 1000 Int$ | 4,989 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 5,594 1000 Int$ | 4,620 1000 Int$ | 6,973 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 8,028 1000 Int$ | 6,973 1000 Int$ | 9,153 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 8,587 1000 Int$ | 7,769 1000 Int$ | 10,311 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 12,818 1000 Int$ | 11,986 1000 Int$ | 13,755 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 13,748 1000 Int$ | 13,527 1000 Int$ | 13,936 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 11 Botswana 23,153 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Micronesia 1,395 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Guinea-Bissau 19,084 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Polynesia 1,315 1000 Int$ compare
- 13 Eswatini 14,495 1000 Int$ compare
- 13 United Republic of Tanzania 484 1000 Int$ compare
- 15 France 13,582 1000 Int$ compare
- 16 Haiti 13,340 1000 Int$ compare
- 17 Vanuatu 12,072 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Congo
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 11.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1011 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 254.21 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.72 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3588 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 10.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 10.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.4% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Congo?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Congo was 13,803 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 13,936 1000 Int$ in 2021.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 3,487 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Congo rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Congo ranks 14th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.