Copra Cake — Feed in Guatemala
Guatemala: Copra Cake — Feed was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Copra Cake — Feed in Guatemala, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for copra cake — feed in Guatemala is 0 t, measured in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.
Over the whole period, copra cake — feed in Guatemala peaked at 368 t in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.
Guatemala ranks 92nd of 124 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Copra Cake — Feed in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t | — |
| 1962 | 0 t | — |
| 1963 | 0 t | — |
| 1964 | 0 t | — |
| 1965 | 0 t | — |
| 1966 | 0 t | — |
| 1967 | 0 t | — |
| 1968 | 0 t | — |
| 1969 | 0 t | — |
| 1970 | 0 t | — |
| 1971 | 0 t | — |
| 1972 | 0 t | — |
| 1973 | 0 t | — |
| 1974 | 0 t | — |
| 1975 | 0 t | — |
| 1976 | 0 t | — |
| 1977 | 0 t | — |
| 1978 | 0 t | — |
| 1979 | 0 t | — |
| 1980 | 0 t | — |
| 1981 | 0 t | — |
| 1982 | 0 t | — |
| 1983 | 0 t | — |
| 1984 | 0 t | — |
| 1985 | 0 t | — |
| 1986 | 0 t | — |
| 1987 | 0 t | — |
| 1988 | 0 t | — |
| 1989 | 0 t | — |
| 1990 | 0 t | — |
| 1991 | 0 t | — |
| 1992 | 0 t | — |
| 1993 | 0 t | — |
| 1994 | 23 t | — |
| 1995 | 23 t | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1997 | 23 t | — |
| 1998 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1999 | 0 t | — |
| 2000 | 0 t | — |
| 2001 | 0 t | — |
| 2002 | 0 t | — |
| 2003 | 0 t | — |
| 2004 | 65 t | — |
| 2005 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2006 | 2 t | — |
| 2007 | 368 t | +18300.0% |
| 2008 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2009 | 0 t | — |
| 2010 | 0 t | — |
| 2011 | 0 t | — |
| 2012 | 0 t | — |
| 2013 | 0 t | — |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 0 t is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 232 t. (32 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 0 t is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 232 t. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.9 t | 0 t | 23 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 43.5 t | 0 t | 368 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 89 Burkina Faso 1 t compare
- 89 Rwanda 1 t compare
- 89 Sweden 1 t compare
- 92 Argentina 0 t compare
- 92 Austria 0 t compare
- 92 Barbados 0 t compare
- 92 Botswana 0 t compare
- 92 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
- 92 Croatia 0 t compare
- 92 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 92 Czechoslovakia 0 t compare
- 92 Georgia 0 t compare
- 92 Germany 0 t compare
- 92 Greece 0 t compare
- 92 Hungary 0 t compare
- 92 Israel 0 t compare
- 92 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 92 Luxembourg 0 t compare
- 92 Malawi 0 t compare
- 92 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 92 Nepal 0 t compare
- 92 Niger 0 t compare
- 92 North Macedonia 0 t compare
- 92 Norway 0 t compare
- 92 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 92 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 92 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 92 Senegal 0 t compare
- 92 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
- 92 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 92 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 92 Ukraine 0 t compare
- 92 USSR 0 t compare
- 92 Yugoslav SFR 0 t compare
- 92 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Guatemala
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 7.71 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0955 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 630.24 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.437 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is copra cake — feed in Guatemala?
- Copra cake — feed in Guatemala was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest copra cake — feed recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 368 t in 2007.
- What is the lowest copra cake — feed recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
- How does Guatemala rank for copra cake — feed?
- Guatemala ranks 92nd out of 124 countries with data for 2013.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Copra Cake — Feed. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.