Statizoid

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Residuals in Western Europe

Western Europe: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
Rank
4th
of 10 groups
All-time high
7,747 1000 t
in 2011
All-time low
-2 1000 t
in 2015
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Residuals in Western Europe, 2010–2023

02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k2010201620232010: 5.5k 1000 t2011: 7.7k 1000 t2012: 6.7k 1000 t2013: 5.7k 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: -2 1000 t2016: -1 1000 t2017: -2 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for sugar (raw equivalent) — residuals in Western Europe is 0 1000 t, measured in 2023.

The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sugar (raw equivalent) — residuals in Western Europe peaked at 7,747 1000 t in 2011 and was at its lowest, -2 1000 t, in 2015.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 2,564 1000 t -2 1000 t 7,747 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Western Europe

  1. 1 Azerbaijan, Republic of 25 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Djibouti 13 1000 t compare
  3. 3 Kiribati 3 1000 t compare
  4. 4 Tajikistan, Republic of 1 1000 t compare
  5. 5 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
  6. 5 Naoero, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  7. 5 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  8. 5 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 0 1000 t compare
  9. 5 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  10. 5 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  11. 5 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  12. 5 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  13. 5 Comoros, Union of the 0 1000 t compare
  14. 5 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  15. 5 São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  16. 5 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  17. 5 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  18. 5 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  19. 5 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  20. 5 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  21. 5 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  22. 5 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  23. 5 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  24. 5 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  25. 5 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  26. 5 Uzbekistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  27. 5 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  28. 5 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  29. 5 Armenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  30. 5 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  31. 5 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  32. 5 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  33. 5 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  34. 5 North Macedonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  35. 5 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  36. 5 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  37. 5 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  38. 5 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  39. 5 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  40. 5 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
  41. 5 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  42. 5 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  43. 5 St. Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  44. 5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  45. 5 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  46. 5 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  47. 5 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  48. 5 Kyrgyz Republic 0 1000 t compare
  49. 5 Estonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  50. 5 Croatia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  51. 5 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  52. 5 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  53. 5 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  54. 5 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  55. 5 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  56. 5 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  57. 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  58. 5 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  59. 5 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  60. 5 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  61. 5 Gambia, The 0 1000 t compare
  62. 5 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  63. 5 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  64. 5 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  65. 5 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  66. 5 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  67. 5 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  68. 5 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  69. 5 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  70. 5 Latvia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  71. 5 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  72. 5 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  73. 5 Lithuania, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  74. 5 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  75. 5 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  76. 5 Czech Republic 0 1000 t compare
  77. 5 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  78. 5 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
  79. 5 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  80. 5 Congo, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  81. 5 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  82. 5 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  83. 5 Slovenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  84. 5 Belarus, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  85. 5 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  86. 5 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  87. 5 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  88. 5 Serbia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  89. 5 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  90. 5 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  91. 5 Poland, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  92. 5 Fiji, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  93. 5 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  94. 5 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  95. 5 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  96. 5 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  97. 5 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  98. 5 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  99. 5 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  100. 5 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  101. 5 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  102. 5 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  103. 5 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  104. 5 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  105. 5 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  106. 5 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  107. 5 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  108. 5 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  109. 5 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  110. 5 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  111. 5 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  112. 5 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  113. 5 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  114. 5 Madagascar, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  115. 5 France 0 1000 t compare
  116. 5 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  117. 5 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  118. 5 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  119. 5 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  120. 5 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  121. 5 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  122. 5 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  123. 5 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  124. 5 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  125. 5 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  126. 5 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  127. 5 Mozambique, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  128. 5 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  129. 5 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  130. 5 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  131. 5 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  132. 5 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  133. 5 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  134. 5 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  135. 5 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  136. 5 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  137. 5 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  138. 5 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  139. 5 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  140. 5 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  141. 5 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  142. 5 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  143. 5 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  144. 5 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
  145. 5 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  146. 5 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  147. 5 India 0 1000 t compare
  148. 5 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  149. 5 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  150. 5 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  151. 5 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  152. 5 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  153. 5 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  154. 5 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  155. 5 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  156. 5 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  157. 5 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  158. 5 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  159. 5 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  160. 5 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  161. 5 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  162. 5 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  163. 5 China (People’s Republic of) 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 213 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Western Europe

All data for Western Europe →

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar (raw equivalent) — residuals in Western Europe?
Sugar (raw equivalent) — residuals in Western Europe was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sugar (raw equivalent) — residuals recorded in Western Europe?
The highest recorded value was 7,747 1000 t in 2011.
What is the lowest sugar (raw equivalent) — residuals recorded in Western Europe?
The lowest recorded value was -2 1000 t in 2015.
How does Western Europe rank for sugar (raw equivalent) — residuals?
Western Europe ranks 4th out of 10 groups with data for 2023.
Is sugar (raw equivalent) — residuals rising or falling in Western Europe?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Western Europe data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Residuals in Western Europe. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-raw-equivalent-residuals/western-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-raw-equivalent-residuals/western-europe/">Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Residuals in Western Europe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,901 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.