Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand

Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value was 17.9 % in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
17.9 %
Change on year
up 0.6%
Rank
5th
of 36 groups
All-time high
17.9 %
in 2020
All-time low
16.4 %
in 2000
Years of data
21
2000–2020

Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2020

051015202000201020202000: 16.4 %2001: 16.5 %2002: 16.6 %2003: 16.6 %2004: 16.7 %2005: 16.8 %2006: 16.9 %2007: 17 %2008: 17.1 %2009: 17.2 %2010: 17.3 %2011: 17.4 %2012: 17.4 %2013: 17.5 %2014: 17.6 %2015: 17.6 %2016: 17.7 %2017: 17.7 %2018: 17.8 %2019: 17.8 %2020: 17.9 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand is 17.9 %, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and up 3.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand peaked at 17.9 % in 2020 and was at its lowest, 16.4 %, in 2000.

Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th of 36 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, 2000 to 2020.
Year % Change
2000 16.4 %
2001 16.5 % +0.6%
2002 16.6 % +0.6%
2003 16.6 % +0.0%
2004 16.7 % +0.6%
2005 16.8 % +0.6%
2006 16.9 % +0.6%
2007 17 % +0.6%
2008 17.1 % +0.6%
2009 17.2 % +0.6%
2010 17.3 % +0.6%
2011 17.4 % +0.6%
2012 17.4 % +0.0%
2013 17.5 % +0.6%
2014 17.6 % +0.6%
2015 17.6 % +0.0%
2016 17.7 % +0.6%
2017 17.7 % +0.0%
2018 17.8 % +0.6%
2019 17.8 % +0.0%
2020 17.9 % +0.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 16.78 % 16.4 % 17.2 % 10
2010s 17.58 % 17.3 % 17.8 % 10
2020s 17.9 % 17.9 % 17.9 % 1

Countries ranked near Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand

  1. 2 Bangladesh 23 % compare
  2. 2 Comoros 23 % compare
  3. 2 Melanesia 18 % compare
  4. 4 Côte d'Ivoire 18.3 % compare
  5. 4 Philippines 21.1 % compare
  6. 4 Polynesia 16.8 % compare
  7. 5 Lao People's Democratic Republic 16.7 % compare
  8. 5 Liberia 19.9 % compare
  9. 6 Nepal 19.7 % compare
  10. 7 Guinea-Bissau 19.5 % compare
  11. 8 Papua New Guinea 19.4 % compare
  12. 8 Türkiye 12.9 % compare

See the full ranking of 198 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand

All data for Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand was 17.9 % in 2020, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value recorded in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 17.9 % in 2020.
What is the lowest prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value recorded in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 16.4 % in 2000.
How does Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand rank for prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value?
Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th out of 36 groups with data for 2020.
Is prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value rising or falling in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/prevalence-of-low-birthweight-percent-value/oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/prevalence-of-low-birthweight-percent-value/oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/">Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
198 places, 4,158 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.