Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity in Land Locked Developing Countries

Land Locked Developing Countries: Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity was 0 t in 2013. β—† Volatile

Latest (2013)
0 t
Rank
4th
of 25 groups
All-time high
4,763 t
in 1973
All-time low
0 t
in 1961
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity in Land Locked Developing Countries, 1961–2013

01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

In 2013, jute-like fibres β€” import quantity in Land Locked Developing Countries stood at 0 t. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.

Over the whole period, jute-like fibres β€” import quantity in Land Locked Developing Countries peaked at 4,763 t in 1973 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.

That places Land Locked Developing Countries 4th out of 25 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.1111 t 0 t 1 t 9
1970s 2,520 t 526 t 4,763 t 10
1980s 294.8 t 0 t 1,548 t 10
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
2000s 119.2 t 0 t 759 t 10
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries

  1. 1 Chile 13 t compare
  2. 2 Bangladesh 0 t compare
  3. 2 Benin 0 t compare
  4. 2 Bulgaria 0 t compare
  5. 2 CοΏ½te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
  6. 2 Cuba 0 t compare
  7. 2 Fiji 0 t compare
  8. 2 Germany 0 t compare
  9. 2 Hungary 0 t compare
  10. 2 India 0 t compare
  11. 2 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 t compare
  12. 2 Israel 0 t compare
  13. 2 Kyrgyzstan 0 t compare
  14. 2 Madagascar 0 t compare
  15. 2 Malawi 0 t compare
  16. 2 Mali 0 t compare
  17. 2 Mozambique 0 t compare
  18. 2 Nicaragua 0 t compare
  19. 2 Oman 0 t compare
  20. 2 Pakistan 0 t compare
  21. 2 Peru 0 t compare
  22. 2 Philippines 0 t compare
  23. 2 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
  24. 2 Spain 0 t compare
  25. 2 Uganda 0 t compare
  26. 2 Caribbean 0 t compare
  27. 2 Melanesia 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 52 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is jute-like fibres β€” import quantity in Land Locked Developing Countries?
Jute-like fibres β€” import quantity in Land Locked Developing Countries was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest jute-like fibres β€” import quantity recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries?
The highest recorded value was 4,763 t in 1973.
What is the lowest jute-like fibres β€” import quantity recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries?
The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries rank for jute-like fibres β€” import quantity?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th out of 25 groups with data for 2013.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
52 places, 2,665 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.