Hungary vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity

Hungary
0 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries
0 t
in 2013
Hungary rank
2nd
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
4th

Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity over time

  • Hungary
  • Land Locked Developing Countries
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119872013

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Land Locked Developing Countries, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.

Hungary ranks 2nd and Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th of 27 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Land Locked Developing Countries Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0.1111 t 0.1111 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1970s 0 t 2,520 t 2,520 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1980s 0 t 294.8 t 294.8 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1990s 0.9 t 0 t 0.9 t Hungary
2000s 0.7 t 119.2 t 118.5 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher jute-like fibres β€” import quantity, Hungary or Land Locked Developing Countries?
Hungary, at 0 t against 0 t in Land Locked Developing Countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in jute-like fibres β€” import quantity between Hungary and Land Locked Developing Countries?
0 t, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Land Locked Developing Countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Hungary and Land Locked Developing Countries rank globally for jute-like fibres β€” import quantity?
Hungary ranks 2nd and Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-like-fibres-import-quantity/hungary/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-like-fibres-import-quantity/hungary/land-locked-developing-countries/">Hungary vs Land Locked Developing Countries: Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Jute-Like Fibres β€” Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
52 places, 2,665 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.