Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Asia
Southern Asia: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 184.06 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Asia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Analysis
Southern Asia recorded 184.06 for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.7% on the previous year and up 81.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Asia peaked at 185.31 in 2023 and was at its lowest, 11.72, in 1961.
That places Southern Asia 3rd out of 23 groups with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Asia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 11.72 | — |
| 1962 | 12.28 | +4.8% |
| 1963 | 12.77 | +4.0% |
| 1964 | 13.31 | +4.2% |
| 1965 | 13.8 | +3.7% |
| 1966 | 14.33 | +3.8% |
| 1967 | 14.82 | +3.4% |
| 1968 | 15.28 | +3.1% |
| 1969 | 15.78 | +3.3% |
| 1970 | 16.15 | +2.3% |
| 1971 | 16.64 | +3.0% |
| 1972 | 17.24 | +3.6% |
| 1973 | 17.43 | +1.1% |
| 1974 | 17.69 | +1.5% |
| 1975 | 18.08 | +2.2% |
| 1976 | 18.4 | +1.8% |
| 1977 | 18.74 | +1.8% |
| 1978 | 19.06 | +1.7% |
| 1979 | 19.4 | +1.8% |
| 1980 | 59.52 | +206.8% |
| 1981 | 53.61 | -9.9% |
| 1982 | 61.54 | +14.8% |
| 1983 | 68.26 | +10.9% |
| 1984 | 86.27 | +26.4% |
| 1985 | 84.2 | -2.4% |
| 1986 | 82.77 | -1.7% |
| 1987 | 99.3 | +20.0% |
| 1988 | 102.57 | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 99.44 | -3.1% |
| 1990 | 100.34 | +0.9% |
| 1991 | 66.69 | -33.5% |
| 1992 | 69.59 | +4.3% |
| 1993 | 69.52 | -0.1% |
| 1994 | 67.86 | -2.4% |
| 1995 | 68.12 | +0.4% |
| 1996 | 70.37 | +3.3% |
| 1997 | 59.25 | -15.8% |
| 1998 | 60.02 | +1.3% |
| 1999 | 60.56 | +0.9% |
| 2000 | 58.95 | -2.7% |
| 2001 | 59.92 | +1.6% |
| 2002 | 64.54 | +7.7% |
| 2003 | 65.08 | +0.8% |
| 2004 | 65.83 | +1.2% |
| 2005 | 67.37 | +2.3% |
| 2006 | 69.87 | +3.7% |
| 2007 | 70.08 | +0.3% |
| 2008 | 69.16 | -1.3% |
| 2009 | 73.36 | +6.1% |
| 2010 | 75.76 | +3.3% |
| 2011 | 86.12 | +13.7% |
| 2012 | 94.94 | +10.2% |
| 2013 | 105.78 | +11.4% |
| 2014 | 101.19 | -4.3% |
| 2015 | 99.62 | -1.6% |
| 2016 | 99.19 | -0.4% |
| 2017 | 104.22 | +5.1% |
| 2018 | 131.13 | +25.8% |
| 2019 | 157.02 | +19.7% |
| 2020 | 140.58 | -10.5% |
| 2021 | 148.23 | +5.4% |
| 2022 | 165.76 | +11.8% |
| 2023 | 185.31 | +11.8% |
| 2024 | 184.06 | -0.7% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Asia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | +206.8% | 19.4 | 59.52 |
| 1991 | -33.5% | 100.34 | 66.69 |
| 1984 | +26.4% | 68.26 | 86.27 |
| 2018 | +25.8% | 104.22 | 131.13 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.79 | 11.72 | 15.78 | 9 |
| 1970s | 17.88 | 16.15 | 19.4 | 10 |
| 1980s | 79.75 | 53.61 | 102.57 | 10 |
| 1990s | 69.23 | 59.25 | 100.34 | 10 |
| 2000s | 66.42 | 58.95 | 73.36 | 10 |
| 2010s | 105.5 | 75.76 | 157.02 | 10 |
| 2020s | 164.79 | 140.58 | 185.31 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Southern Asia
More agriculture & rural data for Southern Asia
- Sheep — Stocks, annual growth rate 3.87 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Producing 7.31 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 1.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw milk of cattle — Production, annual growth rate 5.62 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals, annual growth rate 4.28 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth 7.31 % change on previous year (2024)
- Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production, annual growth rate 4.72 % change on previous year (2024)
- Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth 1.9 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, annual growth rate 7.69 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, annual growth rate 5.81 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Asia?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Southern Asia was 184.06 in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Southern Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 185.31 in 2023.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Southern Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.72 in 1961.
- How does Southern Asia rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Southern Asia ranks 3rd out of 23 groups with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Southern Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 81.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Southern Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.