Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines
Philippines: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 70,957 1000 SLC in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
70,957 1000 SLC
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
26th
of 48 countries
All-time high
235,490 1000 SLC
in 1966
All-time low
58,527 1000 SLC
in 2017
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines is 70,957 1000 SLC, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and down 31.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines peaked at 235,490 1000 SLC in 1966 and was at its lowest, 58,527 1000 SLC, in 2017.
That places Philippines 26th out of 48 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 201,612 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 178,072 1000 SLC | -11.7% |
| 1963 | 172,440 1000 SLC | -3.2% |
| 1964 | 212,038 1000 SLC | +23.0% |
| 1965 | 211,224 1000 SLC | -0.4% |
| 1966 | 235,490 1000 SLC | +11.5% |
| 1967 | 232,244 1000 SLC | -1.4% |
| 1968 | 228,646 1000 SLC | -1.5% |
| 1969 | 217,303 1000 SLC | -5.0% |
| 1970 | 212,221 1000 SLC | -2.3% |
| 1971 | 196,435 1000 SLC | -7.4% |
| 1972 | 171,690 1000 SLC | -12.6% |
| 1973 | 142,622 1000 SLC | -16.9% |
| 1974 | 157,930 1000 SLC | +10.7% |
| 1975 | 183,823 1000 SLC | +16.4% |
| 1976 | 190,651 1000 SLC | +3.7% |
| 1977 | 154,531 1000 SLC | -18.9% |
| 1978 | 140,556 1000 SLC | -9.0% |
| 1979 | 132,666 1000 SLC | -5.6% |
| 1980 | 129,683 1000 SLC | -2.2% |
| 1981 | 139,503 1000 SLC | +7.6% |
| 1982 | 139,000 1000 SLC | -0.4% |
| 1983 | 143,587 1000 SLC | +3.3% |
| 1984 | 143,587 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 181,398 1000 SLC | +26.3% |
| 1986 | 174,298 1000 SLC | -3.9% |
| 1987 | 181,079 1000 SLC | +3.9% |
| 1988 | 165,923 1000 SLC | -8.4% |
| 1989 | 143,587 1000 SLC | -13.5% |
| 1990 | 136,647 1000 SLC | -4.8% |
| 1991 | 133,416 1000 SLC | -2.4% |
| 1992 | 136,503 1000 SLC | +2.3% |
| 1993 | 134,716 1000 SLC | -1.3% |
| 1994 | 136,583 1000 SLC | +1.4% |
| 1995 | 139,487 1000 SLC | +2.1% |
| 1996 | 142,303 1000 SLC | +2.0% |
| 1997 | 136,056 1000 SLC | -4.4% |
| 1998 | 118,020 1000 SLC | -13.3% |
| 1999 | 128,861 1000 SLC | +9.2% |
| 2000 | 128,750 1000 SLC | -0.1% |
| 2001 | 130,337 1000 SLC | +1.2% |
| 2002 | 131,055 1000 SLC | +0.6% |
| 2003 | 111,806 1000 SLC | -14.7% |
| 2004 | 132,259 1000 SLC | +18.3% |
| 2005 | 131,589 1000 SLC | -0.5% |
| 2006 | 131,103 1000 SLC | -0.4% |
| 2007 | 129,667 1000 SLC | -1.1% |
| 2008 | 132,132 1000 SLC | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 133,033 1000 SLC | +0.7% |
| 2010 | 123,485 1000 SLC | -7.2% |
| 2011 | 121,969 1000 SLC | -1.2% |
| 2012 | 118,890 1000 SLC | -2.5% |
| 2013 | 107,738 1000 SLC | -9.4% |
| 2014 | 104,196 1000 SLC | -3.3% |
| 2015 | 97,087 1000 SLC | -6.8% |
| 2016 | 75,695 1000 SLC | -22.0% |
| 2017 | 58,527 1000 SLC | -22.7% |
| 2018 | 77,103 1000 SLC | +31.7% |
| 2019 | 70,441 1000 SLC | -8.6% |
| 2020 | 68,690 1000 SLC | -2.5% |
| 2021 | 72,078 1000 SLC | +4.9% |
| 2022 | 70,403 1000 SLC | -2.3% |
| 2023 | 70,390 1000 SLC | -0.0% |
| 2024 | 70,957 1000 SLC | +0.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 209,897 1000 SLC | 172,440 1000 SLC | 235,490 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 168,312 1000 SLC | 132,666 1000 SLC | 212,221 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 154,164 1000 SLC | 129,683 1000 SLC | 181,398 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 134,259 1000 SLC | 118,020 1000 SLC | 142,303 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 129,173 1000 SLC | 111,806 1000 SLC | 133,033 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 95,513 1000 SLC | 58,527 1000 SLC | 123,485 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 70,504 1000 SLC | 68,690 1000 SLC | 72,078 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 23 China, mainland 242,341 1000 SLC compare
- 24 Honduras 107,631 1000 SLC compare
- 25 Nicaragua 79,303 1000 SLC compare
- 27 Malawi 35,816 1000 SLC compare
- 28 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 28,500 1000 SLC compare
- 29 Mozambique 27,189 1000 SLC compare
More agriculture & rural data for Philippines
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2488 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0859 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 358.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.0874 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4423 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines was 70,957 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 235,490 1000 SLC in 1966.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 58,527 1000 SLC in 2017.
- How does Philippines rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Philippines ranks 26th out of 48 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.