Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Spain
Spain: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 1,822 1000 Int$ in 2017. ▲ Rising
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Spain, 1961–2017
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2017, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Spain stood at 1,822 1000 Int$.
That represents a change of down 4.4% on the previous year and down 16.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Spain peaked at 2,650 1000 Int$ in 1981 and was at its lowest, 373 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Spain 38th out of 76 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 57 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Spain, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 373 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 471 1000 Int$ | +26.3% |
| 1963 | 490 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1964 | 392 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 1965 | 392 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 588 1000 Int$ | +50.0% |
| 1967 | 451 1000 Int$ | -23.3% |
| 1968 | 458 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1969 | 479 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 1970 | 763 1000 Int$ | +59.3% |
| 1971 | 1,133 1000 Int$ | +48.5% |
| 1972 | 959 1000 Int$ | -15.4% |
| 1973 | 1,270 1000 Int$ | +32.4% |
| 1974 | 1,425 1000 Int$ | +12.2% |
| 1975 | 1,413 1000 Int$ | -0.8% |
| 1976 | 1,562 1000 Int$ | +10.5% |
| 1977 | 1,628 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1978 | 1,737 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1979 | 1,632 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 1980 | 2,218 1000 Int$ | +35.9% |
| 1981 | 2,650 1000 Int$ | +19.5% |
| 1982 | 2,568 1000 Int$ | -3.1% |
| 1983 | 1,611 1000 Int$ | -37.3% |
| 1984 | 1,328 1000 Int$ | -17.6% |
| 1985 | 1,394 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1986 | 1,464 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1987 | 1,482 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1988 | 1,420 1000 Int$ | -4.2% |
| 1989 | 1,505 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 1990 | 1,613 1000 Int$ | +7.2% |
| 1991 | 1,596 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1992 | 1,418 1000 Int$ | -11.2% |
| 1993 | 1,352 1000 Int$ | -4.7% |
| 1994 | 1,624 1000 Int$ | +20.1% |
| 1995 | 1,922 1000 Int$ | +18.3% |
| 1996 | 1,324 1000 Int$ | -31.1% |
| 1997 | 1,373 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1998 | 1,334 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 1999 | 1,769 1000 Int$ | +32.6% |
| 2000 | 1,308 1000 Int$ | -26.1% |
| 2001 | 1,681 1000 Int$ | +28.5% |
| 2002 | 1,743 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 2003 | 1,525 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 2004 | 1,605 1000 Int$ | +5.2% |
| 2005 | 1,743 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 2006 | 2,070 1000 Int$ | +18.8% |
| 2007 | 2,179 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2008 | 1,783 1000 Int$ | -18.2% |
| 2009 | 1,749 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 2010 | 1,416 1000 Int$ | -19.0% |
| 2011 | 1,249 1000 Int$ | -11.8% |
| 2012 | 1,519 1000 Int$ | +21.6% |
| 2013 | 1,499 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 2014 | 1,552 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 2015 | 1,521 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 2016 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +25.3% |
| 2017 | 1,822 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 454.89 1000 Int$ | 373 1000 Int$ | 588 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 1,352 1000 Int$ | 763 1000 Int$ | 1,737 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1,764 1000 Int$ | 1,328 1000 Int$ | 2,650 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,532 1000 Int$ | 1,324 1000 Int$ | 1,922 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,739 1000 Int$ | 1,308 1000 Int$ | 2,179 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,560 1000 Int$ | 1,249 1000 Int$ | 1,906 1000 Int$ | 8 |
Countries ranked near Spain
- 35 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1,988 1000 Int$ compare
- 36 Philippines 1,938 1000 Int$ compare
- 37 Costa Rica 1,842 1000 Int$ compare
- 39 Nicaragua 1,606 1000 Int$ compare
- 40 China, Taiwan Province of 1,576 1000 Int$ compare
- 41 Serbia 1,455 1000 Int$
More agriculture & rural data for Spain
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 7.64 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0268 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,036 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.0113 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1949 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Spain?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Spain was 1,822 1000 Int$ in 2017, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Spain?
- The highest recorded value was 2,650 1000 Int$ in 1981.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Spain?
- The lowest recorded value was 373 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Spain rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Spain ranks 38th out of 76 countries with data for 2017.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Spain?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Spain data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.