Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines
Philippines: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 1,938 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
1,938 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
36th
of 76 countries
All-time high
6,433 1000 Int$
in 1966
All-time low
1,599 1000 Int$
in 2017
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Philippines recorded 1,938 1000 Int$ for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in 2024.
That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and down 31.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines peaked at 6,433 1000 Int$ in 1966 and was at its lowest, 1,599 1000 Int$, in 2017.
Philippines ranks 36th of 76 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 5,508 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 4,865 1000 Int$ | -11.7% |
| 1963 | 4,711 1000 Int$ | -3.2% |
| 1964 | 5,793 1000 Int$ | +23.0% |
| 1965 | 5,770 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 1966 | 6,433 1000 Int$ | +11.5% |
| 1967 | 6,345 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 1968 | 6,246 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 1969 | 5,936 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 1970 | 5,798 1000 Int$ | -2.3% |
| 1971 | 5,366 1000 Int$ | -7.5% |
| 1972 | 4,690 1000 Int$ | -12.6% |
| 1973 | 3,896 1000 Int$ | -16.9% |
| 1974 | 4,314 1000 Int$ | +10.7% |
| 1975 | 5,022 1000 Int$ | +16.4% |
| 1976 | 5,208 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1977 | 4,222 1000 Int$ | -18.9% |
| 1978 | 3,840 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
| 1979 | 3,624 1000 Int$ | -5.6% |
| 1980 | 3,543 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 1981 | 3,811 1000 Int$ | +7.6% |
| 1982 | 3,797 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 1983 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 1984 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 4,955 1000 Int$ | +26.3% |
| 1986 | 4,762 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
| 1987 | 4,947 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 1988 | 4,533 1000 Int$ | -8.4% |
| 1989 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | -13.5% |
| 1990 | 3,733 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1991 | 3,645 1000 Int$ | -2.4% |
| 1992 | 3,729 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1993 | 3,680 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 1994 | 3,731 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1995 | 3,811 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1996 | 3,887 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1997 | 3,717 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
| 1998 | 3,224 1000 Int$ | -13.3% |
| 1999 | 3,520 1000 Int$ | +9.2% |
| 2000 | 3,517 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2001 | 3,561 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 3,580 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2003 | 3,054 1000 Int$ | -14.7% |
| 2004 | 3,613 1000 Int$ | +18.3% |
| 2005 | 3,595 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 2006 | 3,582 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 2007 | 3,542 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 2008 | 3,610 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 3,634 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2010 | 3,373 1000 Int$ | -7.2% |
| 2011 | 3,332 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2012 | 3,248 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 2013 | 2,943 1000 Int$ | -9.4% |
| 2014 | 2,846 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 2015 | 2,652 1000 Int$ | -6.8% |
| 2016 | 2,068 1000 Int$ | -22.0% |
| 2017 | 1,599 1000 Int$ | -22.7% |
| 2018 | 2,106 1000 Int$ | +31.7% |
| 2019 | 1,924 1000 Int$ | -8.6% |
| 2020 | 1,877 1000 Int$ | -2.4% |
| 2021 | 1,969 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 2022 | 1,923 1000 Int$ | -2.3% |
| 2023 | 1,923 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1,938 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,734 1000 Int$ | 4,711 1000 Int$ | 6,433 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 4,598 1000 Int$ | 3,624 1000 Int$ | 5,798 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 4,212 1000 Int$ | 3,543 1000 Int$ | 4,955 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3,668 1000 Int$ | 3,224 1000 Int$ | 3,887 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 3,529 1000 Int$ | 3,054 1000 Int$ | 3,634 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,609 1000 Int$ | 1,599 1000 Int$ | 3,373 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,926 1000 Int$ | 1,877 1000 Int$ | 1,969 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 33 Iraq 2,212 1000 Int$ compare
- 34 Mozambique 2,149 1000 Int$ compare
- 35 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1,988 1000 Int$ compare
- 37 Costa Rica 1,842 1000 Int$ compare
- 38 Spain 1,822 1000 Int$ compare
- 39 Nicaragua 1,606 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Philippines
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2488 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0859 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 358.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.0874 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4423 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Philippines was 1,938 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 6,433 1000 Int$ in 1966.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,599 1000 Int$ in 2017.
- How does Philippines rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Philippines ranks 36th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.