Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Samoa
Samoa: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 657 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
657 1000 Int$
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
51st
of 76 countries
All-time high
660 1000 Int$
in 2002
All-time low
174 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Samoa, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Samoa stood at 657 1000 Int$.
That represents a change of up 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Samoa peaked at 660 1000 Int$ in 2002 and was at its lowest, 174 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Samoa 51st out of 76 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Samoa, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 174 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 218 1000 Int$ | +25.3% |
| 1963 | 240 1000 Int$ | +10.1% |
| 1964 | 251 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 1965 | 262 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1966 | 272 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1967 | 283 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1968 | 327 1000 Int$ | +15.5% |
| 1969 | 349 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1970 | 381 1000 Int$ | +9.2% |
| 1971 | 414 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 1972 | 458 1000 Int$ | +10.6% |
| 1973 | 479 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 1974 | 523 1000 Int$ | +9.2% |
| 1975 | 588 1000 Int$ | +12.4% |
| 1976 | 654 1000 Int$ | +11.2% |
| 1977 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 632 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 1991 | 610 1000 Int$ | -3.5% |
| 1992 | 588 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 1993 | 610 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1994 | 626 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1995 | 635 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1996 | 654 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 1997 | 648 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 1998 | 651 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 1999 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2000 | 656 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2001 | 659 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2002 | 660 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2003 | 652 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2004 | 652 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 652 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 652 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 652 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 651 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 2009 | 651 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 651 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 651 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2013 | 654 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 655 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 656 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 657 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 264 1000 Int$ | 174 1000 Int$ | 349 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 545.9 1000 Int$ | 381 1000 Int$ | 654 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 654 1000 Int$ | 654 1000 Int$ | 654 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 630.8 1000 Int$ | 588 1000 Int$ | 654 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 653.7 1000 Int$ | 651 1000 Int$ | 660 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 654.9 1000 Int$ | 651 1000 Int$ | 657 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 657 1000 Int$ | 657 1000 Int$ | 657 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Samoa
More agriculture & rural data for Samoa
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.65 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0909 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 533.81 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.586 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.8249 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Samoa?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Samoa was 657 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Samoa?
- The highest recorded value was 660 1000 Int$ in 2002.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Samoa?
- The lowest recorded value was 174 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Samoa rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Samoa ranks 51st out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Samoa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Samoa data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.