Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Malaysia
Malaysia: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 4,513 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
4,513 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 22.8%
World rank
29th
of 76 countries
All-time high
39,661 1000 Int$
in 1964
All-time low
453 1000 Int$
in 2012
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Malaysia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Malaysia recorded 4,513 1000 Int$ for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 22.8% on the previous year and up 484.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Malaysia peaked at 39,661 1000 Int$ in 1964 and was at its lowest, 453 1000 Int$, in 2012.
That places Malaysia 29th out of 76 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Malaysia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 23,099 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 13,947 1000 Int$ | -39.6% |
| 1963 | 26,150 1000 Int$ | +87.5% |
| 1964 | 39,661 1000 Int$ | +51.7% |
| 1965 | 30,509 1000 Int$ | -23.1% |
| 1966 | 25,061 1000 Int$ | -17.9% |
| 1967 | 23,971 1000 Int$ | -4.3% |
| 1968 | 22,882 1000 Int$ | -4.5% |
| 1969 | 18,087 1000 Int$ | -21.0% |
| 1970 | 18,959 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1971 | 16,780 1000 Int$ | -11.5% |
| 1972 | 14,383 1000 Int$ | -14.3% |
| 1973 | 17,434 1000 Int$ | +21.2% |
| 1974 | 19,613 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1975 | 17,434 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 1976 | 21,138 1000 Int$ | +21.2% |
| 1977 | 21,792 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 1978 | 20,702 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 1979 | 19,613 1000 Int$ | -5.3% |
| 1980 | 18,523 1000 Int$ | -5.6% |
| 1981 | 18,523 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 18,523 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 17,434 1000 Int$ | -5.9% |
| 1984 | 18,523 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 1985 | 16,998 1000 Int$ | -8.2% |
| 1986 | 17,434 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1987 | 16,998 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 1988 | 14,165 1000 Int$ | -16.7% |
| 1989 | 9,806 1000 Int$ | -30.8% |
| 1990 | 6,973 1000 Int$ | -28.9% |
| 1991 | 3,879 1000 Int$ | -44.4% |
| 1992 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1993 | 4,271 1000 Int$ | +8.9% |
| 1994 | 4,751 1000 Int$ | +11.2% |
| 1995 | 4,947 1000 Int$ | +4.1% |
| 1996 | 4,315 1000 Int$ | -12.8% |
| 1997 | 4,576 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 1998 | 4,358 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1999 | 4,380 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2000 | 3,487 1000 Int$ | -20.4% |
| 2001 | 3,094 1000 Int$ | -11.3% |
| 2002 | 2,942 1000 Int$ | -4.9% |
| 2003 | 2,179 1000 Int$ | -25.9% |
| 2004 | 1,896 1000 Int$ | -13.0% |
| 2005 | 1,525 1000 Int$ | -19.6% |
| 2006 | 1,351 1000 Int$ | -11.4% |
| 2007 | 1,406 1000 Int$ | +4.1% |
| 2008 | 1,416 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2009 | 1,387 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 2010 | 629 1000 Int$ | -54.7% |
| 2011 | 611 1000 Int$ | -2.9% |
| 2012 | 453 1000 Int$ | -25.9% |
| 2013 | 639 1000 Int$ | +41.1% |
| 2014 | 772 1000 Int$ | +20.8% |
| 2015 | 1,058 1000 Int$ | +37.0% |
| 2016 | 1,967 1000 Int$ | +85.9% |
| 2017 | 3,214 1000 Int$ | +63.4% |
| 2018 | 4,767 1000 Int$ | +48.3% |
| 2019 | 6,344 1000 Int$ | +33.1% |
| 2020 | 7,779 1000 Int$ | +22.6% |
| 2021 | 8,529 1000 Int$ | +9.6% |
| 2022 | 7,231 1000 Int$ | -15.2% |
| 2023 | 5,847 1000 Int$ | -19.1% |
| 2024 | 4,513 1000 Int$ | -22.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,819 1000 Int$ | 13,947 1000 Int$ | 39,661 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 18,785 1000 Int$ | 14,383 1000 Int$ | 21,792 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 16,693 1000 Int$ | 9,806 1000 Int$ | 18,523 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 4,637 1000 Int$ | 3,879 1000 Int$ | 6,973 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2,068 1000 Int$ | 1,351 1000 Int$ | 3,487 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,045 1000 Int$ | 453 1000 Int$ | 6,344 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 6,780 1000 Int$ | 4,513 1000 Int$ | 8,529 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Malaysia
More agriculture & rural data for Malaysia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 13.04 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0822 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,078 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.913 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2261 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.2% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Malaysia?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Malaysia was 4,513 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Malaysia?
- The highest recorded value was 39,661 1000 Int$ in 1964.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Malaysia?
- The lowest recorded value was 453 1000 Int$ in 2012.
- How does Malaysia rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Malaysia ranks 29th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Malaysia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 484.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malaysia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.