Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Ecuador
Ecuador: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 5,835 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
5,835 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.2%
World rank
28th
of 76 countries
All-time high
6,544 1000 Int$
in 1983
All-time low
549 1000 Int$
in 2003
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Ecuador, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 5,835 1000 Int$ for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in 2024.
The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 9.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Ecuador peaked at 6,544 1000 Int$ in 1983 and was at its lowest, 549 1000 Int$, in 2003.
That places Ecuador 28th out of 76 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 2,179 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 2,179 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 2,615 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1964 | 2,615 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 3,487 1000 Int$ | +33.3% |
| 1966 | 3,051 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 1967 | 3,487 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1968 | 4,206 1000 Int$ | +20.6% |
| 1969 | 3,705 1000 Int$ | -11.9% |
| 1970 | 3,705 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1972 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 3,487 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 1974 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1975 | 4,358 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1976 | 4,840 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1977 | 4,903 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1978 | 5,012 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1979 | 2,018 1000 Int$ | -59.7% |
| 1980 | 1,935 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 1981 | 2,158 1000 Int$ | +11.5% |
| 1982 | 5,212 1000 Int$ | +141.5% |
| 1983 | 6,544 1000 Int$ | +25.6% |
| 1984 | 6,146 1000 Int$ | -6.1% |
| 1985 | 2,820 1000 Int$ | -54.1% |
| 1986 | 3,240 1000 Int$ | +14.9% |
| 1987 | 3,938 1000 Int$ | +21.5% |
| 1988 | 3,779 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1989 | 3,432 1000 Int$ | -9.2% |
| 1990 | 4,250 1000 Int$ | +23.8% |
| 1991 | 1,591 1000 Int$ | -62.6% |
| 1992 | 1,791 1000 Int$ | +12.6% |
| 1993 | 1,460 1000 Int$ | -18.5% |
| 1994 | 2,390 1000 Int$ | +63.7% |
| 1995 | 1,834 1000 Int$ | -23.3% |
| 1996 | 2,245 1000 Int$ | +22.4% |
| 1997 | 943 1000 Int$ | -58.0% |
| 1998 | 1,167 1000 Int$ | +23.8% |
| 1999 | 1,176 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2000 | 1,199 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2001 | 1,106 1000 Int$ | -7.8% |
| 2002 | 678 1000 Int$ | -38.7% |
| 2003 | 549 1000 Int$ | -19.0% |
| 2004 | 1,497 1000 Int$ | +172.7% |
| 2005 | 2,193 1000 Int$ | +46.5% |
| 2006 | 2,397 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 2007 | 2,942 1000 Int$ | +22.7% |
| 2008 | 3,269 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 2009 | 3,487 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 2010 | 4,358 1000 Int$ | +25.0% |
| 2011 | 5,448 1000 Int$ | +25.0% |
| 2012 | 5,121 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 2013 | 5,230 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 5,318 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2015 | 5,887 1000 Int$ | +10.7% |
| 2016 | 5,478 1000 Int$ | -6.9% |
| 2017 | 5,685 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 5,757 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2019 | 5,827 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2020 | 5,874 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 5,819 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 2022 | 5,840 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 5,845 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2024 | 5,835 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,058 1000 Int$ | 2,179 1000 Int$ | 4,206 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 4,009 1000 Int$ | 2,018 1000 Int$ | 5,012 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3,920 1000 Int$ | 1,935 1000 Int$ | 6,544 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,885 1000 Int$ | 943 1000 Int$ | 4,250 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,932 1000 Int$ | 549 1000 Int$ | 3,487 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 5,411 1000 Int$ | 4,358 1000 Int$ | 5,887 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 5,843 1000 Int$ | 5,819 1000 Int$ | 5,874 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Ecuador?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Ecuador was 5,835 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 6,544 1000 Int$ in 1983.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 549 1000 Int$ in 2003.
- How does Ecuador rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Ecuador ranks 28th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.