Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Japan
Japan: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 11,974 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
11,974 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.7%
World rank
18th
of 76 countries
All-time high
22,751 1000 Int$
in 1973
All-time low
11,484 1000 Int$
in 2019
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Japan, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Japan is 11,974 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.7% on the previous year and down 2.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Japan peaked at 22,751 1000 Int$ in 1973 and was at its lowest, 11,484 1000 Int$, in 2019.
Japan ranks 18th of 76 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Japan, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 15,756 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 16,780 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 1963 | 18,327 1000 Int$ | +9.2% |
| 1964 | 20,790 1000 Int$ | +13.4% |
| 1965 | 18,785 1000 Int$ | -9.6% |
| 1966 | 20,005 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 1967 | 19,874 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 1968 | 16,039 1000 Int$ | -19.3% |
| 1969 | 16,017 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1970 | 14,579 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
| 1971 | 17,150 1000 Int$ | +17.6% |
| 1972 | 19,613 1000 Int$ | +14.4% |
| 1973 | 22,751 1000 Int$ | +16.0% |
| 1974 | 20,724 1000 Int$ | -8.9% |
| 1975 | 19,417 1000 Int$ | -6.3% |
| 1976 | 18,044 1000 Int$ | -7.1% |
| 1977 | 19,133 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 1978 | 21,661 1000 Int$ | +13.2% |
| 1979 | 21,378 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 1980 | 18,676 1000 Int$ | -12.6% |
| 1981 | 19,373 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1982 | 17,913 1000 Int$ | -7.5% |
| 1983 | 20,049 1000 Int$ | +11.9% |
| 1984 | 20,593 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1985 | 19,482 1000 Int$ | -5.4% |
| 1986 | 20,136 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1987 | 18,937 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 1988 | 18,698 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 1989 | 18,414 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 1990 | 19,090 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1991 | 16,605 1000 Int$ | -13.0% |
| 1992 | 16,453 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 1993 | 11,593 1000 Int$ | -29.5% |
| 1994 | 18,894 1000 Int$ | +63.0% |
| 1995 | 17,651 1000 Int$ | -6.6% |
| 1996 | 15,233 1000 Int$ | -13.7% |
| 1997 | 14,819 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1998 | 15,690 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1999 | 16,344 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 2000 | 16,453 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2001 | 16,409 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2002 | 15,865 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 2003 | 13,119 1000 Int$ | -17.3% |
| 2004 | 13,228 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2005 | 13,990 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 2006 | 12,727 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
| 2007 | 12,683 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2008 | 13,794 1000 Int$ | +8.8% |
| 2009 | 13,555 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 2010 | 13,162 1000 Int$ | -2.9% |
| 2011 | 12,727 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 2012 | 13,620 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 2013 | 13,838 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2014 | 12,269 1000 Int$ | -11.3% |
| 2015 | 12,356 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2016 | 13,032 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 2017 | 13,402 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 2018 | 13,358 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 11,484 1000 Int$ | -14.0% |
| 2020 | 11,986 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 2021 | 12,045 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 12,129 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2023 | 12,057 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2024 | 11,974 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,041 1000 Int$ | 15,756 1000 Int$ | 20,790 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 19,445 1000 Int$ | 14,579 1000 Int$ | 22,751 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 19,227 1000 Int$ | 17,913 1000 Int$ | 20,593 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 16,237 1000 Int$ | 11,593 1000 Int$ | 19,090 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 14,182 1000 Int$ | 12,683 1000 Int$ | 16,453 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 12,925 1000 Int$ | 11,484 1000 Int$ | 13,838 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 12,038 1000 Int$ | 11,974 1000 Int$ | 12,129 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Japan
More agriculture & rural data for Japan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.95 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0096 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 323.87 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.077 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.0% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.6% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Japan?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Japan was 11,974 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Japan?
- The highest recorded value was 22,751 1000 Int$ in 1973.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Japan?
- The lowest recorded value was 11,484 1000 Int$ in 2019.
- How does Japan rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Japan ranks 18th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Japan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Japan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.