Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in China
China: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 11,823 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
11,823 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.6%
World rank
19th
of 76 countries
All-time high
12,821 1000 Int$
in 1987
All-time low
1,960 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in China, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
China recorded 11,823 1000 Int$ for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and up 13.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in China peaked at 12,821 1000 Int$ in 1987 and was at its lowest, 1,960 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places China 19th out of 76 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in China, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,960 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 2,332 1000 Int$ | +19.0% |
| 1963 | 2,423 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 1964 | 2,596 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1965 | 2,101 1000 Int$ | -19.1% |
| 1966 | 2,268 1000 Int$ | +7.9% |
| 1967 | 2,462 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 1968 | 3,262 1000 Int$ | +32.5% |
| 1969 | 3,597 1000 Int$ | +10.3% |
| 1970 | 4,633 1000 Int$ | +28.8% |
| 1971 | 5,556 1000 Int$ | +19.9% |
| 1972 | 5,538 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 1973 | 4,358 1000 Int$ | -21.3% |
| 1974 | 5,410 1000 Int$ | +24.1% |
| 1975 | 5,726 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 1976 | 8,280 1000 Int$ | +44.6% |
| 1977 | 9,698 1000 Int$ | +17.1% |
| 1978 | 9,160 1000 Int$ | -5.5% |
| 1979 | 8,809 1000 Int$ | -3.8% |
| 1980 | 8,033 1000 Int$ | -8.8% |
| 1981 | 8,253 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1982 | 5,038 1000 Int$ | -39.0% |
| 1983 | 4,553 1000 Int$ | -9.6% |
| 1984 | 4,474 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 1985 | 3,964 1000 Int$ | -11.4% |
| 1986 | 3,912 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 1987 | 12,821 1000 Int$ | +227.7% |
| 1988 | 11,207 1000 Int$ | -12.6% |
| 1989 | 7,162 1000 Int$ | -36.1% |
| 1990 | 6,806 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 1991 | 5,448 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 1992 | 5,230 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1993 | 2,179 1000 Int$ | -58.3% |
| 1994 | 2,659 1000 Int$ | +22.0% |
| 1995 | 2,706 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1996 | 2,615 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 1997 | 2,987 1000 Int$ | +14.2% |
| 1998 | 2,942 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 1999 | 3,051 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 2000 | 3,223 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 2001 | 3,160 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 2002 | 3,269 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 2003 | 3,051 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 2004 | 2,615 1000 Int$ | -14.3% |
| 2005 | 2,179 1000 Int$ | -16.7% |
| 2006 | 3,269 1000 Int$ | +50.0% |
| 2007 | 3,596 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 2008 | 3,705 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2009 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 2010 | 4,247 1000 Int$ | +8.3% |
| 2011 | 3,705 1000 Int$ | -12.8% |
| 2012 | 10,896 1000 Int$ | +194.1% |
| 2013 | 10,896 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 10,446 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 2015 | 10,896 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 2016 | 10,896 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 11,023 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2018 | 11,247 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 11,986 1000 Int$ | +6.6% |
| 2020 | 11,768 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 2021 | 11,511 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2022 | 11,649 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2023 | 11,747 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2024 | 11,823 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,556 1000 Int$ | 1,960 1000 Int$ | 3,597 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 6,717 1000 Int$ | 4,358 1000 Int$ | 9,698 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 6,942 1000 Int$ | 3,912 1000 Int$ | 12,821 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3,662 1000 Int$ | 2,179 1000 Int$ | 6,806 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 3,199 1000 Int$ | 2,179 1000 Int$ | 3,923 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 9,624 1000 Int$ | 3,705 1000 Int$ | 11,986 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 11,700 1000 Int$ | 11,511 1000 Int$ | 11,823 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
More agriculture & rural data for China
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0666 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 923.03 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3366 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in China?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in China was 11,823 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 12,821 1000 Int$ in 1987.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,960 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does China rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- China ranks 19th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.