Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Bhutan
Bhutan: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 7,818 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
7,818 1000 Int$
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
25th
of 76 countries
All-time high
7,949 1000 Int$
in 2012
All-time low
2,354 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Bhutan, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Bhutan stood at 7,818 1000 Int$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Bhutan peaked at 7,949 1000 Int$ in 2012 and was at its lowest, 2,354 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Bhutan 25th out of 76 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 2,354 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 2,419 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1963 | 2,484 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1964 | 2,550 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1965 | 2,615 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1966 | 2,680 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1967 | 2,746 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1968 | 2,778 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1969 | 2,844 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1970 | 2,877 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1971 | 2,942 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1972 | 3,007 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1973 | 3,073 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1974 | 3,138 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1975 | 3,203 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1976 | 3,269 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1977 | 3,334 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1978 | 3,400 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1979 | 3,465 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1980 | 3,530 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1981 | 3,596 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1982 | 3,661 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1983 | 3,726 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1984 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1985 | 4,032 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 3,923 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1987 | 4,140 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 1988 | 4,228 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1989 | 4,315 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1990 | 4,402 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1991 | 4,489 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1992 | 4,576 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1993 | 4,663 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1994 | 4,751 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1995 | 4,881 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1996 | 4,916 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 1997 | 4,969 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1998 | 4,990 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 1999 | 5,274 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 2000 | 5,291 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2001 | 5,361 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 5,433 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2003 | 5,557 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 5,596 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2005 | 5,579 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2006 | 5,753 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2007 | 5,859 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2008 | 5,840 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2009 | 5,252 1000 Int$ | -10.1% |
| 2010 | 4,950 1000 Int$ | -5.8% |
| 2011 | 7,757 1000 Int$ | +56.7% |
| 2012 | 7,949 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 2013 | 7,589 1000 Int$ | -4.5% |
| 2014 | 7,253 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
| 2015 | 7,308 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2016 | 7,340 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 7,452 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2018 | 7,590 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2019 | 7,725 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2020 | 7,820 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2021 | 7,840 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 7,795 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2023 | 7,818 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 7,818 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,608 1000 Int$ | 2,354 1000 Int$ | 2,844 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 3,171 1000 Int$ | 2,877 1000 Int$ | 3,465 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3,907 1000 Int$ | 3,530 1000 Int$ | 4,315 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 4,791 1000 Int$ | 4,402 1000 Int$ | 5,274 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 5,552 1000 Int$ | 5,252 1000 Int$ | 5,859 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 7,291 1000 Int$ | 4,950 1000 Int$ | 7,949 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 7,818 1000 Int$ | 7,795 1000 Int$ | 7,840 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
More agriculture & rural data for Bhutan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1368 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 614.64 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8653 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.5657 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 13.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 13.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Bhutan?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Bhutan was 7,818 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 7,949 1000 Int$ in 2012.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2,354 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Bhutan rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Bhutan ranks 25th out of 76 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.