Cotton lint — Export Quantity in Finland
Finland: Cotton lint — Export Quantity was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Cotton lint — Export Quantity in Finland, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cotton lint — export quantity in Finland is 0 t, measured in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.
Over the whole period, cotton lint — export quantity in Finland peaked at 135 t in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.
Finland ranks 102nd of 140 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cotton lint — Export Quantity in Finland, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t | — |
| 1962 | 0 t | — |
| 1963 | 0 t | — |
| 1964 | 0 t | — |
| 1965 | 0 t | — |
| 1966 | 0 t | — |
| 1967 | 0 t | — |
| 1968 | 0 t | — |
| 1969 | 0 t | — |
| 1970 | 0 t | — |
| 1971 | 0 t | — |
| 1972 | 0 t | — |
| 1973 | 0 t | — |
| 1974 | 0 t | — |
| 1975 | 2 t | — |
| 1976 | 47 t | +2250.0% |
| 1977 | 38 t | -19.1% |
| 1978 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1979 | 0 t | — |
| 1980 | 1 t | — |
| 1981 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1982 | 1 t | — |
| 1983 | 1 t | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1985 | 0 t | — |
| 1986 | 0 t | — |
| 1987 | 35 t | — |
| 1988 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1989 | 0 t | — |
| 1990 | 2 t | — |
| 1991 | 102 t | +5000.0% |
| 1992 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1993 | 0 t | — |
| 1994 | 0 t | — |
| 1995 | 80 t | — |
| 1996 | 135 t | +68.8% |
| 1997 | 113 t | -16.3% |
| 1998 | 22 t | -80.5% |
| 1999 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2000 | 0 t | — |
| 2001 | 0 t | — |
| 2002 | 0 t | — |
| 2003 | 0 t | — |
| 2004 | 0 t | — |
| 2005 | 0 t | — |
| 2006 | 0 t | — |
| 2007 | 0 t | — |
| 2008 | 0 t | — |
| 2009 | 23 t | — |
| 2010 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2011 | 0 t | — |
| 2012 | 0 t | — |
| 2013 | 0 t | — |
Finland compared with similar countries
- Finland's 0 t is below the median for high income countries, which is 11 t. (42 countries reporting)
- Finland's 0 t is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 91.5 t. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cotton lint — Export Quantity in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | +5000.0% | 2 t | 102 t |
| 1976 | +2250.0% | 2 t | 47 t |
| 1996 | +68.8% | 80 t | 135 t |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 8.7 t | 0 t | 47 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.8 t | 0 t | 35 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 45.4 t | 0 t | 135 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.3 t | 0 t | 23 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 99 Canada 1 t compare
- 99 Morocco 1 t compare
- 99 Slovakia 1 t compare
- 102 Albania 0 t compare
- 102 Algeria 0 t compare
- 102 Angola 0 t compare
- 102 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 102 Botswana 0 t compare
- 102 Chile 0 t compare
- 102 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
- 102 Croatia 0 t compare
- 102 Cuba 0 t compare
- 102 Dominican Republic 0 t compare
- 102 Ecuador 0 t compare
- 102 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 102 Estonia 0 t compare
- 102 Ethiopia 0 t compare
- 102 Ethiopia PDR 0 t compare
- 102 Gambia 0 t compare
- 102 Georgia 0 t compare
- 102 Grenada 0 t compare
- 102 Guinea-Bissau 0 t compare
- 102 Haiti 0 t compare
- 102 Honduras 0 t compare
- 102 Japan 0 t compare
- 102 Jordan 0 t compare
- 102 Kuwait 0 t compare
- 102 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 102 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 102 Malta 0 t compare
- 102 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 102 Myanmar 0 t compare
- 102 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 102 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 102 Norway 0 t compare
- 102 Romania 0 t compare
- 102 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 t compare
- 102 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 t compare
- 102 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 102 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 102 Uruguay 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Finland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,466 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5476 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2548 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 7.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cotton lint — export quantity in Finland?
- Cotton lint — export quantity in Finland was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest cotton lint — export quantity recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 135 t in 1996.
- What is the lowest cotton lint — export quantity recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
- How does Finland rank for cotton lint — export quantity?
- Finland ranks 102nd out of 140 countries with data for 2013.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Cotton lint — Export Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.