Silk — Other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries
Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Silk — Other uses was 209,592 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Silk — Other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for silk — other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries is 209,592 t, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 53 years on record.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 57.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, silk — other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries peaked at 209,592 t in 2013 and was at its lowest, 24,519 t, in 1962.
That places Low Income Food Deficit Countries 3rd out of 28 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Silk — Other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 24,983 t | — |
| 1962 | 24,519 t | -1.9% |
| 1963 | 25,167 t | +2.6% |
| 1964 | 26,973 t | +7.2% |
| 1965 | 28,556 t | +5.9% |
| 1966 | 25,979 t | -9.0% |
| 1967 | 28,941 t | +11.4% |
| 1968 | 30,282 t | +4.6% |
| 1969 | 29,784 t | -1.6% |
| 1970 | 38,762 t | +30.1% |
| 1971 | 37,495 t | -3.3% |
| 1972 | 37,840 t | +0.9% |
| 1973 | 36,189 t | -4.4% |
| 1974 | 37,290 t | +3.0% |
| 1975 | 36,609 t | -1.8% |
| 1976 | 44,111 t | +20.5% |
| 1977 | 50,587 t | +14.7% |
| 1978 | 57,277 t | +13.2% |
| 1979 | 60,441 t | +5.5% |
| 1980 | 67,691 t | +12.0% |
| 1981 | 71,672 t | +5.9% |
| 1982 | 74,781 t | +4.3% |
| 1983 | 77,468 t | +3.6% |
| 1984 | 80,923 t | +4.5% |
| 1985 | 81,427 t | +0.6% |
| 1986 | 82,625 t | +1.5% |
| 1987 | 86,091 t | +4.2% |
| 1988 | 88,616 t | +2.9% |
| 1989 | 96,330 t | +8.7% |
| 1990 | 93,588 t | -2.8% |
| 1991 | 95,755 t | +2.3% |
| 1992 | 119,490 t | +24.8% |
| 1993 | 123,004 t | +2.9% |
| 1994 | 122,871 t | -0.1% |
| 1995 | 108,007 t | -12.1% |
| 1996 | 112,924 t | +4.6% |
| 1997 | 120,549 t | +6.8% |
| 1998 | 120,664 t | +0.1% |
| 1999 | 120,304 t | -0.3% |
| 2000 | 110,707 t | -8.0% |
| 2001 | 121,091 t | +9.4% |
| 2002 | 120,545 t | -0.5% |
| 2003 | 133,426 t | +10.7% |
| 2004 | 137,771 t | +3.3% |
| 2005 | 147,222 t | +6.9% |
| 2006 | 164,263 t | +11.6% |
| 2007 | 176,806 t | +7.6% |
| 2008 | 169,178 t | -4.3% |
| 2009 | 177,367 t | +4.8% |
| 2010 | 205,211 t | +15.7% |
| 2011 | 206,351 t | +0.6% |
| 2012 | 209,392 t | +1.5% |
| 2013 | 209,592 t | +0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27,243 t | 24,519 t | 30,282 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 43,660 t | 36,189 t | 60,441 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 80,762 t | 67,691 t | 96,330 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 113,716 t | 93,588 t | 123,004 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 145,838 t | 110,707 t | 177,367 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 207,636 t | 205,211 t | 209,592 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries
- 1 China, mainland 500,480 t compare
- 2 India 178,279 t compare
- 3 Uzbekistan 27,323 t compare
- 3 Viet Nam 9,395 t compare
- 4 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 4,413 t compare
- 4 Thailand 6,420 t compare
- 5 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 800 t compare
- 5 Turkmenistan 4,480 t compare
- 6 Romania 4,172 t compare
- 6 United Republic of Tanzania 1 t compare
- 6 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 1 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries
- Soyabean Cake — Import Quantity 1.45 million t (2013)
- Cotton lint — Import Quantity 1.02 million t (2013)
- Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity 32.42 million t (2013)
- Brans — Feed 33.02 million t (2013)
- Brans — Domestic supply quantity 38.76 million t (2013)
- Brans — Production 39.37 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Production 83.37 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Domestic supply quantity 78.05 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Export Quantity 3.26 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Stock Variation -3.75 million t (2013)
Frequently asked questions
- What is silk — other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- Silk — other uses in Low Income Food Deficit Countries was 209,592 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest silk — other uses recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- The highest recorded value was 209,592 t in 2013.
- What is the lowest silk — other uses recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- The lowest recorded value was 24,519 t in 1962.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank for silk — other uses?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 3rd out of 28 groups with data for 2013.
- Is silk — other uses rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- Over the last ten years it is up 57.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.