Silk — Other uses in United Republic of Tanzania
United Republic of Tanzania: Silk — Other uses was 1 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Silk — Other uses in United Republic of Tanzania, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for silk — other uses in United Republic of Tanzania is 1 t, measured in 2013.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 99.4% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, silk — other uses in United Republic of Tanzania peaked at 168 t in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Silk — Other uses in United Republic of Tanzania, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t | — |
| 1962 | 0 t | — |
| 1963 | 0 t | — |
| 1964 | 0 t | — |
| 1965 | 0 t | — |
| 1966 | 0 t | — |
| 1967 | 0 t | — |
| 1968 | 0 t | — |
| 1969 | 0 t | — |
| 1970 | 0 t | — |
| 1971 | 0 t | — |
| 1972 | 0 t | — |
| 1973 | 0 t | — |
| 1974 | 0 t | — |
| 1975 | 0 t | — |
| 1976 | 0 t | — |
| 1977 | 0 t | — |
| 1978 | 90 t | — |
| 1979 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1980 | 0 t | — |
| 1981 | 0 t | — |
| 1982 | 0 t | — |
| 1983 | 0 t | — |
| 1984 | 0 t | — |
| 1985 | 0 t | — |
| 1986 | 0 t | — |
| 1987 | 0 t | — |
| 1988 | 0 t | — |
| 1989 | 0 t | — |
| 1990 | 0 t | — |
| 1991 | 0 t | — |
| 1992 | 0 t | — |
| 1993 | 0 t | — |
| 1994 | 0 t | — |
| 1995 | 1 t | — |
| 1996 | 24 t | +2300.0% |
| 1997 | 15 t | -37.5% |
| 1998 | 1 t | -93.3% |
| 1999 | 2 t | +100.0% |
| 2000 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2001 | 0 t | — |
| 2002 | 3 t | — |
| 2003 | 1 t | -66.7% |
| 2004 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2005 | 0 t | — |
| 2006 | 0 t | — |
| 2007 | 2 t | — |
| 2008 | 4 t | +100.0% |
| 2009 | 4 t | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2011 | 1 t | — |
| 2012 | 168 t | +16700.0% |
| 2013 | 1 t | -99.4% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Silk — Other uses in United Republic of Tanzania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +16700.0% | 1 t | 168 t |
| 1996 | +2300.0% | 1 t | 24 t |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 9 t | 0 t | 90 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.3 t | 0 t | 24 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.4 t | 0 t | 4 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 42.5 t | 0 t | 168 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near United Republic of Tanzania
- 3 Uzbekistan 27,323 t compare
- 3 Viet Nam 9,395 t compare
- 4 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 4,413 t compare
- 4 Thailand 6,420 t compare
- 5 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 800 t compare
- 5 Turkmenistan 4,480 t compare
- 6 Romania 4,172 t compare
- 6 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 1 t compare
- 7 Brazil 3,241 t compare
- 8 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 t compare
- 8 USSR 2,550 t compare
- 9 Tajikistan 1,762 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for United Republic of Tanzania
- Pulses, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 1.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate -7.21 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, annual growth rate 8.85 % change on previous year (2024)
- Poultry Birds — Stocks, annual growth rate 0.5952 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate -5.09 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate -5.48 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate -5.19 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 0.3061 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate 17.29 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Production, annual growth rate -3.22 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is silk — other uses in United Republic of Tanzania?
- Silk — other uses in United Republic of Tanzania was 1 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest silk — other uses recorded in United Republic of Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 168 t in 2012.
- What is the lowest silk — other uses recorded in United Republic of Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
- How does United Republic of Tanzania rank for silk — other uses?
- United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th out of 8 countries with data for 2013.
- Is silk — other uses rising or falling in United Republic of Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this United Republic of Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.