Rubber — Stock Variation in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Rubber — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ▬ Flat
Rubber — Stock Variation in Zimbabwe, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded 0 t for rubber — stock variation in 2013.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rubber — stock variation in Zimbabwe peaked at 850 t in 2005 and was at its lowest, -3,300 t, in 1990.
Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 44 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t | -200 t | 500 t | 10 |
| 1990s | -600 t | -3,300 t | 800 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 600 t | 0 t | 850 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 2 Cambodia 35,000 t compare
- 3 Estonia 50 t compare
- 3 United Republic of Tanzania 50 t compare
- 5 Algeria 0 t compare
- 5 Australia 0 t compare
- 5 Belarus 0 t compare
- 5 Belgium 0 t compare
- 5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 t compare
- 5 Botswana 0 t compare
- 5 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 5 Cameroon 0 t compare
- 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 5 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
- 5 Congo 0 t compare
- 5 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 5 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 5 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 5 Ethiopia 0 t compare
- 5 Gabon 0 t compare
- 5 Guinea 0 t compare
- 5 Honduras 0 t compare
- 5 Indonesia 0 t compare
- 5 Ireland 0 t compare
- 5 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 5 Kuwait 0 t compare
- 5 Luxembourg 0 t compare
- 5 Mali 0 t compare
- 5 Malta 0 t compare
- 5 Myanmar 0 t compare
- 5 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 5 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 5 Oman 0 t compare
- 5 Peru 0 t compare
- 5 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 5 Serbia 0 t compare
- 5 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 5 Sweden 0 t compare
- 5 Thailand 0 t compare
- 5 Timor-Leste 0 t compare
- 5 Zambia 0 t compare
- 5 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe
- Agriculture share gdp 9.47 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 9.47 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.3% (2024)
- Rural population 59.5% (2025)
- Rural population growth 0.9% (2025)
- Rural population 10.09 million (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 9.5% (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 4.85 billion current US$ (2025)
- Bananas — Production 325,400 t (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rubber — stock variation in Zimbabwe?
- Rubber — stock variation in Zimbabwe was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest rubber — stock variation recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 850 t in 2005.
- What is the lowest rubber — stock variation recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was -3,300 t in 1990.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for rubber — stock variation?
- Zimbabwe ranks 5th out of 44 countries with data for 2013.
- Is rubber — stock variation rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rubber — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.