Rubber — Stock Variation in Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste: Rubber — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
0 t
World rank
5th
of 44 countries
All-time high
132 t
in 1969
All-time low
0 t
in 1961
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Rubber — Stock Variation in Timor-Leste, 1961–2013

050100150196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for rubber — stock variation in Timor-Leste is 0 t, measured in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.

Over the whole period, rubber — stock variation in Timor-Leste peaked at 132 t in 1969 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.

Timor-Leste ranks 5th of 44 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 26.44 t 0 t 132 t 9
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
2000s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t 4

Countries ranked near Timor-Leste

  1. 2 Cambodia 35,000 t compare
  2. 3 Estonia 50 t compare
  3. 3 United Republic of Tanzania 50 t compare
  4. 5 Algeria 0 t compare
  5. 5 Australia 0 t compare
  6. 5 Belarus 0 t compare
  7. 5 Belgium 0 t compare
  8. 5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 t compare
  9. 5 Botswana 0 t compare
  10. 5 Bulgaria 0 t compare
  11. 5 Cameroon 0 t compare
  12. 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
  13. 5 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
  14. 5 Congo 0 t compare
  15. 5 Costa Rica 0 t compare
  16. 5 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
  17. 5 Eswatini 0 t compare
  18. 5 Ethiopia 0 t compare
  19. 5 Gabon 0 t compare
  20. 5 Guinea 0 t compare
  21. 5 Honduras 0 t compare
  22. 5 Indonesia 0 t compare
  23. 5 Ireland 0 t compare
  24. 5 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
  25. 5 Kuwait 0 t compare
  26. 5 Luxembourg 0 t compare
  27. 5 Mali 0 t compare
  28. 5 Malta 0 t compare
  29. 5 Myanmar 0 t compare
  30. 5 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
  31. 5 Nicaragua 0 t compare
  32. 5 Oman 0 t compare
  33. 5 Peru 0 t compare
  34. 5 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
  35. 5 Serbia 0 t compare
  36. 5 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
  37. 5 Sweden 0 t compare
  38. 5 Thailand 0 t compare
  39. 5 Zambia 0 t compare
  40. 5 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
  41. 5 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 72 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Timor-Leste

All data for Timor-Leste →

Frequently asked questions

What is rubber — stock variation in Timor-Leste?
Rubber — stock variation in Timor-Leste was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest rubber — stock variation recorded in Timor-Leste?
The highest recorded value was 132 t in 1969.
What is the lowest rubber — stock variation recorded in Timor-Leste?
The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
How does Timor-Leste rank for rubber — stock variation?
Timor-Leste ranks 5th out of 44 countries with data for 2013.
Where does this Timor-Leste data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rubber — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Rubber — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 3,477 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.