Rubber — Stock Variation in Luxembourg

Luxembourg: Rubber — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
0 t
World rank
5th
of 44 countries
All-time high
51,000 t
in 2010
All-time low
-50,950 t
in 2007
Years of data
14
2000–2013

Rubber — Stock Variation in Luxembourg, 2000–2013

-50.0k-25.0k025.0k50.0k2000200620132000: 0 t2001: 0 t2002: 0 t2003: 0 t2004: 0 t2005: 0 t2006: -50 t2007: -51.0k t2008: -6.0k t2009: 6.0k t2010: 51.0k t2011: 0 t2012: 0 t2013: 0 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for rubber — stock variation in Luxembourg is 0 t, measured in 2013.

That represents a change of up 100.0% over five years.

Over the whole period, rubber — stock variation in Luxembourg peaked at 51,000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, -50,950 t, in 2007.

Luxembourg ranks 5th of 44 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s -5,100 t -50,950 t 6,000 t 10
2010s 12,750 t 0 t 51,000 t 4

Countries ranked near Luxembourg

  1. 2 Cambodia 35,000 t compare
  2. 3 Estonia 50 t compare
  3. 3 United Republic of Tanzania 50 t compare
  4. 5 Algeria 0 t compare
  5. 5 Australia 0 t compare
  6. 5 Belarus 0 t compare
  7. 5 Belgium 0 t compare
  8. 5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 t compare
  9. 5 Botswana 0 t compare
  10. 5 Bulgaria 0 t compare
  11. 5 Cameroon 0 t compare
  12. 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
  13. 5 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
  14. 5 Congo 0 t compare
  15. 5 Costa Rica 0 t compare
  16. 5 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
  17. 5 Eswatini 0 t compare
  18. 5 Ethiopia 0 t compare
  19. 5 Gabon 0 t compare
  20. 5 Guinea 0 t compare
  21. 5 Honduras 0 t compare
  22. 5 Indonesia 0 t compare
  23. 5 Ireland 0 t compare
  24. 5 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
  25. 5 Kuwait 0 t compare
  26. 5 Mali 0 t compare
  27. 5 Malta 0 t compare
  28. 5 Myanmar 0 t compare
  29. 5 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
  30. 5 Nicaragua 0 t compare
  31. 5 Oman 0 t compare
  32. 5 Peru 0 t compare
  33. 5 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
  34. 5 Serbia 0 t compare
  35. 5 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
  36. 5 Sweden 0 t compare
  37. 5 Thailand 0 t compare
  38. 5 Timor-Leste 0 t compare
  39. 5 Zambia 0 t compare
  40. 5 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
  41. 5 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 72 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Luxembourg

All data for Luxembourg →

Frequently asked questions

What is rubber — stock variation in Luxembourg?
Rubber — stock variation in Luxembourg was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest rubber — stock variation recorded in Luxembourg?
The highest recorded value was 51,000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest rubber — stock variation recorded in Luxembourg?
The lowest recorded value was -50,950 t in 2007.
How does Luxembourg rank for rubber — stock variation?
Luxembourg ranks 5th out of 44 countries with data for 2013.
Where does this Luxembourg data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rubber — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Rubber — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 3,477 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.