Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile
Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile stood at 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 17.5% on the previous year and down 26.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile peaked at 0.5679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.1836 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1976.
Chile ranks 124th of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2598 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1963 | 0.2878 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1964 | 0.2749 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1965 | 0.2395 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1966 | 0.2736 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1967 | 0.2445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1968 | 0.248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1969 | 0.2067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 1970 | 0.2341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1971 | 0.2852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1972 | 0.2495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1973 | 0.2123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1974 | 0.343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +61.6% |
| 1975 | 0.2506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -26.9% |
| 1976 | 0.1836 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 1977 | 0.3147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +71.4% |
| 1978 | 0.3321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1979 | 0.2613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1980 | 0.3059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1981 | 0.341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1982 | 0.2852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1983 | 0.232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1984 | 0.3507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +51.1% |
| 1985 | 0.3078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 1986 | 0.2682 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1987 | 0.2466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1988 | 0.3143 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 1989 | 0.2987 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1990 | 0.2808 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1991 | 0.286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1992 | 0.3463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1993 | 0.3137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1994 | 0.3048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1995 | 0.2947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1996 | 0.2806 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1997 | 0.3772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 1998 | 0.2687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 1999 | 0.3369 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 2000 | 0.3347 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2001 | 0.4095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 2002 | 0.4409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2003 | 0.3705 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2004 | 0.3876 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2005 | 0.3781 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2006 | 0.4709 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 2007 | 0.2834 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 2008 | 0.3279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 2009 | 0.3143 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2010 | 0.3673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2011 | 0.5679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +54.6% |
| 2012 | 0.3719 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 2013 | 0.394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2014 | 0.3621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2015 | 0.3284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2016 | 0.3972 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2017 | 0.4852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 2018 | 0.4032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2019 | 0.396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2020 | 0.4384 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2021 | 0.3394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 2022 | 0.3495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2023 | 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.5703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 51% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.6151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 47% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2578 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2878 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2666 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1836 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2951 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.3507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.309 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.3772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2834 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4709 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.4073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.3284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.3539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4384 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 121 Ecuador 0.3609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 122 Afghanistan 0.3411 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Mexico 0.3017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 125 Panama 0.2822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 126 Faroe Islands 0.2796 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 127 Antigua and Barbuda 0.2795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile was 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1836 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1976.
- How does Chile rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Chile ranks 124th out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.