Chile vs Panama: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.2822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
124th
Panama rank
125th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Panama
0.10.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 124th and Panama ranks 125th of 169 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2578 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1554 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.2666 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2378 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.2951 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2708 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0243 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.309 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0914 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.3718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2744 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0974 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.4073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1893 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.3539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Panama?
Chile, at 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Panama?
0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Panama rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 124th and Panama ranks 125th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Panama: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/panama/">Chile vs Panama: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.