Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Chile
Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value was 315,129 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
315,129 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 47.1%
World rank
63rd
of 192 countries
All-time high
422,233 1000 Int$
in 2011
All-time low
136,528 1000 Int$
in 1976
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Chile, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Chile recorded 315,129 1000 Int$ for roots and tubers, total — gross production value in 2024.
The figure is up 47.1% on the previous year and up 17.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Chile peaked at 422,233 1000 Int$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, 136,528 1000 Int$, in 1976.
Chile ranks 63rd of 192 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 212,399 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 193,174 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 1963 | 213,993 1000 Int$ | +10.8% |
| 1964 | 204,387 1000 Int$ | -4.5% |
| 1965 | 178,072 1000 Int$ | -12.9% |
| 1966 | 203,446 1000 Int$ | +14.2% |
| 1967 | 181,810 1000 Int$ | -10.6% |
| 1968 | 184,378 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1969 | 153,681 1000 Int$ | -16.6% |
| 1970 | 174,027 1000 Int$ | +13.2% |
| 1971 | 212,068 1000 Int$ | +21.9% |
| 1972 | 185,527 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 1973 | 157,820 1000 Int$ | -14.9% |
| 1974 | 255,047 1000 Int$ | +61.6% |
| 1975 | 186,334 1000 Int$ | -26.9% |
| 1976 | 136,528 1000 Int$ | -26.7% |
| 1977 | 234,001 1000 Int$ | +71.4% |
| 1978 | 246,896 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 1979 | 194,277 1000 Int$ | -21.3% |
| 1980 | 227,472 1000 Int$ | +17.1% |
| 1981 | 253,533 1000 Int$ | +11.5% |
| 1982 | 212,061 1000 Int$ | -16.4% |
| 1983 | 172,536 1000 Int$ | -18.6% |
| 1984 | 260,763 1000 Int$ | +51.1% |
| 1985 | 228,852 1000 Int$ | -12.2% |
| 1986 | 199,440 1000 Int$ | -12.9% |
| 1987 | 183,376 1000 Int$ | -8.1% |
| 1988 | 233,726 1000 Int$ | +27.5% |
| 1989 | 222,074 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 1990 | 208,771 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 1991 | 212,622 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1992 | 257,518 1000 Int$ | +21.1% |
| 1993 | 233,215 1000 Int$ | -9.4% |
| 1994 | 226,626 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 1995 | 219,112 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 1996 | 208,657 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1997 | 280,440 1000 Int$ | +34.4% |
| 1998 | 199,754 1000 Int$ | -28.8% |
| 1999 | 250,467 1000 Int$ | +25.4% |
| 2000 | 248,871 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2001 | 304,489 1000 Int$ | +22.3% |
| 2002 | 327,831 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 2003 | 275,483 1000 Int$ | -16.0% |
| 2004 | 288,159 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2005 | 281,094 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 2006 | 350,141 1000 Int$ | +24.6% |
| 2007 | 210,744 1000 Int$ | -39.8% |
| 2008 | 243,828 1000 Int$ | +15.7% |
| 2009 | 233,724 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 2010 | 273,132 1000 Int$ | +16.9% |
| 2011 | 422,233 1000 Int$ | +54.6% |
| 2012 | 276,553 1000 Int$ | -34.5% |
| 2013 | 292,936 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 2014 | 268,581 1000 Int$ | -8.3% |
| 2015 | 243,604 1000 Int$ | -9.3% |
| 2016 | 294,846 1000 Int$ | +21.0% |
| 2017 | 360,122 1000 Int$ | +22.1% |
| 2018 | 299,316 1000 Int$ | -16.9% |
| 2019 | 294,170 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 325,644 1000 Int$ | +10.7% |
| 2021 | 252,105 1000 Int$ | -22.6% |
| 2022 | 259,632 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2023 | 214,239 1000 Int$ | -17.5% |
| 2024 | 315,129 1000 Int$ | +47.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 191,704 1000 Int$ | 153,681 1000 Int$ | 213,993 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 198,252 1000 Int$ | 136,528 1000 Int$ | 255,047 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 219,383 1000 Int$ | 172,536 1000 Int$ | 260,763 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 229,718 1000 Int$ | 199,754 1000 Int$ | 280,440 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 276,436 1000 Int$ | 210,744 1000 Int$ | 350,141 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 302,549 1000 Int$ | 243,604 1000 Int$ | 422,233 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 273,350 1000 Int$ | 214,239 1000 Int$ | 325,644 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Chile?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value in Chile was 315,129 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 422,233 1000 Int$ in 2011.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 136,528 1000 Int$ in 1976.
- How does Chile rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
- Chile ranks 63rd out of 192 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.