Chile vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.3017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
124th
Mexico rank
123rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Mexico
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.3017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 124th and Mexico ranks 123rd of 169 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2578 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0691 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1888 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.2666 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.2951 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1365 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.309 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1775 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.3718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.4073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.3539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2975 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0564 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Mexico?
Mexico, at 0.3017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Mexico?
0.0133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 124th and Mexico ranks 123rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/mexico/">Chile vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.