Chile vs Ecuador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.3609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
124th
Ecuador rank
121st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Ecuador
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.3609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Chile ranks 124th and Ecuador ranks 121st of 169 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2578 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.2666 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3513 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.2951 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4474 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1523 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.309 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1845 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.3718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3928 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.4073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.3539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3832 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.3609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Ecuador?
0.0725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 124th and Ecuador ranks 121st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.