Chile vs Faroe Islands: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)
Chile
0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands
0.2796 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
124th
Faroe Islands rank
126th
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time
- Chile
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2796 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Chile ranks 124th and Faroe Islands ranks 126th of 169 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Faroe Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2578 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2779 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Faroe Islands |
| 1970s | 0.2666 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.2951 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0518 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Chile |
| 1990s | 0.309 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2689 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.3718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.4073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.3539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2781 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Faroe Islands?
- Chile, at 0.2884 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2796 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Faroe Islands?
- 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Faroe Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Faroe Islands rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Chile ranks 124th and Faroe Islands ranks 126th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.