Statizoid

Palm Oil β€” Residuals in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Palm Oil β€” Residuals was 187 1000 t in 2023. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2023)
187 1000 t
Rank
1st
of 39 regions
All-time high
414 1000 t
in 2018
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2022
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Palm Oil β€” Residuals in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), 2010–2023

01002003004002010201620232010: 141 1000 t2011: 166 1000 t2012: 196 1000 t2013: 226 1000 t2014: 221 1000 t2015: 268 1000 t2016: 202 1000 t2017: 192 1000 t2018: 414 1000 t2019: 130 1000 t2020: 171 1000 t2021: 201 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 187 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) recorded 187 1000 t for palm oil β€” residuals in 2023.

That represents a change of down 17.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, palm oil β€” residuals in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) peaked at 414 1000 t in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2022.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st of 39 regions on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 14 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 215.6 1000 t 130 1000 t 414 1000 t 10
2020s 139.75 1000 t 0 1000 t 201 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

  1. 1 Djibouti 187 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
  3. 2 Nauru 0 1000 t compare
  4. 2 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  5. 2 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t compare
  6. 2 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  7. 2 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  8. 2 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  9. 2 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  10. 2 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  11. 2 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  12. 2 Comoros 0 1000 t compare
  13. 2 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  14. 2 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t compare
  15. 2 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  16. 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  17. 2 Afghanistan 0 1000 t compare
  18. 2 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  19. 2 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
  20. 2 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  21. 2 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  22. 2 Mauritania 0 1000 t compare
  23. 2 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  24. 2 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  25. 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  26. 2 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  27. 2 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  28. 2 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  29. 2 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  30. 2 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  31. 2 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  32. 2 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  33. 2 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  34. 2 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  35. 2 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  36. 2 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  37. 2 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  38. 2 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  39. 2 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  40. 2 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  41. 2 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  42. 2 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  43. 2 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  44. 2 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  45. 2 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  46. 2 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
  47. 2 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  48. 2 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  49. 2 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t compare
  50. 2 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  51. 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  52. 2 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  53. 2 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  54. 2 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  55. 2 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  56. 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  57. 2 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  58. 2 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  59. 2 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  60. 2 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  61. 2 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  62. 2 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  63. 2 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  64. 2 Congo 0 1000 t compare
  65. 2 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  66. 2 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  67. 2 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  68. 2 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  69. 2 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  70. 2 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  71. 2 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  72. 2 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  73. 2 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  74. 2 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
  75. 2 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  76. 2 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  77. 2 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  78. 2 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  79. 2 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  80. 2 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  81. 2 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  82. 2 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  83. 2 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  84. 2 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  85. 2 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  86. 2 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  87. 2 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  88. 2 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  89. 2 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  90. 2 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  91. 2 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  92. 2 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  93. 2 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  94. 2 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  95. 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  96. 2 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  97. 2 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  98. 2 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  99. 2 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  100. 2 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  101. 2 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  102. 2 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  103. 2 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  104. 2 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  105. 2 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  106. 2 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  107. 2 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  108. 2 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  109. 2 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  110. 2 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  111. 2 Madagascar 0 1000 t compare
  112. 2 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  113. 2 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  114. 2 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  115. 2 France 0 1000 t compare
  116. 2 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  117. 2 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  118. 2 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  119. 2 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  120. 2 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  121. 2 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  122. 2 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  123. 2 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  124. 2 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  125. 2 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  126. 2 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  127. 2 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  128. 2 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  129. 2 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  130. 2 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  131. 2 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
  132. 2 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  133. 2 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  134. 2 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  135. 2 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  136. 2 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  137. 2 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  138. 2 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
  139. 2 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  140. 2 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  141. 2 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  142. 2 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  143. 2 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  144. 2 Ethiopia 0 1000 t compare
  145. 2 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  146. 2 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  147. 2 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  148. 2 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  149. 2 India 0 1000 t compare
  150. 2 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  151. 2 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  152. 2 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  153. 2 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  154. 2 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  155. 2 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  156. 2 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  157. 2 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  158. 2 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  159. 2 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  160. 2 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  161. 2 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  162. 2 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  163. 2 China (People’s Republic of) 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 213 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

All data for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is palm oil β€” residuals in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Palm oil β€” residuals in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) was 187 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest palm oil β€” residuals recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 414 1000 t in 2018.
What is the lowest palm oil β€” residuals recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2022.
How does Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank for palm oil β€” residuals?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st out of 39 regions with data for 2023.
Is palm oil β€” residuals rising or falling in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 17.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Least Developed Countries (LDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Palm Oil β€” Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palm Oil β€” Residuals in Least Developed Countries (LDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/palm-oil-residuals/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/palm-oil-residuals/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Palm Oil β€” Residuals in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Palm Oil β€” Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,889 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.