Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per in Brazil
Brazil: Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per was 79.56 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per in Brazil, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Analysis
In 2024, meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per in Brazil stood at 79.56.
The figure is down 1.4% on the previous year and down 22.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per in Brazil peaked at 866.56 in 1961 and was at its lowest, 77.92, in 2018.
That places Brazil 32nd out of 50 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 866.56 | — |
| 1962 | 843.63 | -2.6% |
| 1963 | 824.08 | -2.3% |
| 1964 | 805.38 | -2.3% |
| 1965 | 785.34 | -2.5% |
| 1966 | 768.72 | -2.1% |
| 1967 | 750.89 | -2.3% |
| 1968 | 736.22 | -2.0% |
| 1969 | 720.09 | -2.2% |
| 1970 | 708.66 | -1.6% |
| 1971 | 695.53 | -1.9% |
| 1972 | 680.77 | -2.1% |
| 1973 | 666.39 | -2.1% |
| 1974 | 654.34 | -1.8% |
| 1975 | 642.6 | -1.8% |
| 1976 | 629.25 | -2.1% |
| 1977 | 614.41 | -2.4% |
| 1978 | 602.47 | -1.9% |
| 1979 | 575.08 | -4.5% |
| 1980 | 581.87 | +1.2% |
| 1981 | 577.95 | -0.7% |
| 1982 | 509.36 | -11.9% |
| 1983 | 498.11 | -2.2% |
| 1984 | 457.81 | -8.1% |
| 1985 | 462.61 | +1.0% |
| 1986 | 467.34 | +1.0% |
| 1987 | 444.29 | -4.9% |
| 1988 | 544.85 | +22.6% |
| 1989 | 481.41 | -11.6% |
| 1990 | 394.07 | -18.1% |
| 1991 | 348.63 | -11.5% |
| 1992 | 304.77 | -12.6% |
| 1993 | 274.88 | -9.8% |
| 1994 | 258.32 | -6.0% |
| 1995 | 254.37 | -1.5% |
| 1996 | 155.1 | -39.0% |
| 1997 | 155.16 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 159.82 | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 159.79 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | 157.61 | -1.4% |
| 2001 | 144.46 | -8.3% |
| 2002 | 153.65 | +6.4% |
| 2003 | 146.43 | -4.7% |
| 2004 | 144.78 | -1.1% |
| 2005 | 143.2 | -1.1% |
| 2006 | 142.74 | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 141.31 | -1.0% |
| 2008 | 128.64 | -9.0% |
| 2009 | 112.19 | -12.8% |
| 2010 | 106.2 | -5.3% |
| 2011 | 109.35 | +3.0% |
| 2012 | 99.51 | -9.0% |
| 2013 | 98.71 | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 101.99 | +3.3% |
| 2015 | 100.63 | -1.3% |
| 2016 | 97.38 | -3.2% |
| 2017 | 91.88 | -5.6% |
| 2018 | 77.92 | -15.2% |
| 2019 | 84.24 | +8.1% |
| 2020 | 85.62 | +1.6% |
| 2021 | 81.7 | -4.6% |
| 2022 | 81.79 | +0.1% |
| 2023 | 80.68 | -1.4% |
| 2024 | 79.56 | -1.4% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 79.56 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 85.82, 93% of the median. (16 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 79.56 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 92.75, 86% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per in Brazil changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -39.0% | 254.37 | 155.1 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 788.99 | 720.09 | 866.56 | 9 |
| 1970s | 646.95 | 575.08 | 708.66 | 10 |
| 1980s | 502.56 | 444.29 | 581.87 | 10 |
| 1990s | 246.49 | 155.1 | 394.07 | 10 |
| 2000s | 141.5 | 112.19 | 157.61 | 10 |
| 2010s | 96.78 | 77.92 | 109.35 | 10 |
| 2020s | 81.87 | 79.56 | 85.62 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More agriculture & rural data for Brazil
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0609 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 652.04 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.95 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1182 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 5.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per in Brazil?
- Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per in Brazil was 79.56 in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 866.56 in 1961.
- What is the lowest meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 77.92 in 2018.
- How does Brazil rank for meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per?
- Brazil ranks 32nd out of 50 countries with data for 2024.
- Is meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Meat of rabbits and hares, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.